SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(SC) 887

B.C.RAY, K.JAGANNATHA SHETTY
Ajit Kumar: Ram Sarup Represented By His Wife – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates:
A.Subhashini, C.K.Suchitra, DALVIR BHANDARI, L.K.PANDEY, M.S.Gupta

Judgment

JAGANNATHA SHETTY, J.:- The petitioners have been convicted and sentenced by the General Court Martial under the Army Act, 1950. They have been lodged in civil jails. They seek a set off their pre-trial detention against the sentence of imprisonment. The claim has been made under S. 428 of the Cr.P.C. ("The Code"). The jail and the army authorities have rejected their claim.

2. If S. 428 of the Cr.P.C. is applicable to the case of the petitioners, there is no doubt that they are entitled to get the benefit thereof. The section provides that where an accused person has, on a conviction, been sentenced to imprisonment for a term (not being imprisonment in default of payment of fine), the period of detention, if any, undergone by him during the investigation, inquiry or trial and before the date of such conviction, shall be set off against the term of imprisonment and the liability of such person to undergo imprisonment shall be restricted to the remainder, if any, of the term of imprisonment imposed on him. The period of detention referred to in the section is of the accused person during the investigation, enquiry or trial of the offence against him. Section 2(h) defines inve











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top