SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(SC) 163

B.C.RAY, S.R.PANDIAN
Dharamdas Shamlal Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
Police Commissioner – Respondent


Advocates:
J.H.Parekh, M.K.Pandit, M.N.SHROFF, M.N.Sompal, M.VAHI, P.H.Parekh, P.S.POTI, Y.S.Chitale

JUDGMENT

S. RATNAVEL PANDIAN, J. :— This is a petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India challenging the legality and validity of the order of detention dated 17-9-1988 passed by the detaining authority (the Commissioner of Police, Ahmedabad City) clamping upon the petitioner (the detenu herein) the impugned order of detention tinder Sub-section (2) of Section 3 of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 1985 on the ground that he on the materials placed before him was satisfied that it was necessary to make this order of detention with view to preventing the detenu from acting in any manner prejudicial to the maintenance of public order in the area of Ahmedabad City and directed the detenu to be detained in Sabarmati Central Prison. In pursuance of the said order, the detenu has been detained in the aforesaid prison.

2. The Government approved the order of detention on 21-9-1988. The detenu submitted his representation dated 22-9-1988 to the 1st respondent who by his order dated 30-9-1988 rejected the same Hence this Writ Petition.

3. Before adverting to the arguments advanced by Dr. Chitale, on behalf of the detenu; we would like to produce the relevant po






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top