SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(SC) 228

K.N.SAIKIA, K.N.SINGH
Assistant Collector Of Central Excise – Appellant
Versus
Ramakrishnan Kulwant Rai – Respondent


Advocates:
A.T.M.SAMPATH, AMBRISH KUMAR, ANIL DEV SINGH, C.V.SUBBA RAO

JUDGMENT

K. N. SAIKIA, J. :— This appeal by Special Leave is from the judgment and Order of the High Court of Judicature at Madras, dated 19th July, 1972 in Writ Petition No. 1864 of 1967, allowing the petition and quashing the demand made by the appellant under R. 10-A of the Central Excise Rules, hereinafter referred to as the Rules, payable by the respondent under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, hereinafter referred to as the Act.

2. M/s. Ramakrishnan Kulwant Rai, the respondent firm, owned the Steel Rolling Mill, located at No. 4-B, 4-C, North Railway Terminus Road, Rayapuram, Madras-13. The said Mill was leased out to a partnership firm known as M/s. Steel Industries. After termination of the lease the respondent firm took back possession of the said Mill on 1-8-1962 and informed the Central Excise Authorities about this by their letter dated 16-11-1962 and resumed manufacture of Steel from scraps and was advised to take out a licence for which it applied on 30-11-1962. Though the respondent firm had ultimately sold away the Rolling Mill on 8-4-1963, the Superintendent of Central Excise, by his letter dated 13-10-1965 demanded a sum of Rs. 31,018.20p as excise duty. On

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top