S.RANGANATHAN, SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE
State Of T. N. – Appellant
Versus
Anandam Vkwanathan – Respondent
JUDGMENT
SABYASACHI MUKHARJI, J. :— Special leave granted in Special Leave petitions (C) Nos. 10539, 4704 and 921 of 1978. These appeals by leave under Article 136 of the Constitution, are from the orders of the High Court of Madras, involving a common question though for different assessment years. It would be appropriate to deal with Civil Appeals Nos. 234547/78, and the facts in other appeals are essentially the same.
2. The assessee in these cases had entered into contracts with the Universities and other educational institutions in the country for printing question papers for the said educational institutions. The assessee in the demand notes prepared, gave the charges for printing, blocks, packing charges, handling charges, delivery charges, postage, value of paper and value of packing materials separately in the relevant assessment years. The question involved is, whether the taxable turnover should also include the printing and block-making charges or not. It appears from the judgment of the High Court that for the assessment year 1966-67, the printing charges amounted to Rs. 99,675.00 and block-making charges amounted to Rs. 2,923.95, totalling Rs. 1,02,598.95. Similarly, s
SQ CST v. M/s Sabarmati Reti Udyog Sahakari Mandali Ltd.
referred to : State of Madras v. Cannon Dunkerley and Co. (Madras) Ltd.
Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. v. State of Karnataka
Patnaik and Co. v. State of Orissa
T. V. Sundram Iyengar and Sons v. State of Madras
relied on : Govt. of A. P. v. Guntur Tobaccos Ltd.
approved : Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. v. State of Karnataka
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.