SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
R.S. PATHAK, CJI., SABYASACHI MUKHARJI, S. NATARAJAN, M.N. VENKATACHALIAH AND S. RANGANATHAN, JJ.
M/s. Ujagar Prints etc. etc., Petitioners
Versus
Union of India and others, Respondents.
Civil Misc. Petn. No. 32937 of 1988 In Writ Petn. No. 12183 of 1985
Decided on 27-1-1989.
Advocates appeared
Mr. K. K. Venugopal, Sr. Advocate, Mrs. Jayashree Wad and Mrs. Aruna Mathur, Advocates with him, for Petitioners; Mr. K. Parasaran, Attorney General, Mr. A.K. Ganguli, Sr. Advocate, Mr. P. Parmeswaran and Mr. K. Swamy, Advocates with them, for Respondents.
Central Excise Rules,1944 – Rule 174 – Assessable- Miscellaneous- Illustration- Petition for clarification of this Courts judgment made clear that the assessable value of processed fabric would be value of grey-cloth in hands of processor plus the value of job-work done plus manufacturing profit and manufacturing expenses whatever these may be, which will either be included in price at factory gate or deemed to be price at factory gate processed fabric factory gate here means deemed" factory gate as if the processed fabric was sold by processor order to explain position it is made clear by following illustration – Held, Excise authorities as the assessable-value of the processed fabric and excise duty would be charged to processor on that basis provided that declaration as to the price at which he would be selling the processed goods in the market, would include only price or deemed price at which processed fabric would leave the processors factory plus his enjoins that when goods owned by one person are manufactured by another information is required relating to price at which said manufacturer is selling said goods and the person so authorised agrees to discharge all liabilities rules made price at which he is selling goods must be value of grey-cloth or fabric plus value of job-work done plus the manufacturing profit and manufacturing expenses but not any other subsequent profit or expenses –Order accordingly.
JUDGMENT
ORDER :— In respect of the civil miscellaneous petition for clarification of this Courts judgment dated 4th November, 1988 (reported in AIR 1989 SC 516), it is made clear that the assessable value of the processed fabric would be the value of the grey-cloth in the hands of the processor plus the value of the job-work done, plus manufacturing profit and manufacturing expenses whatever these may be, which will either be included in the price at the factory gate or deemed to be the price at the factory gate for, the processed fabric. The factory gate here means the deemed" factory gate as if the processed fabric was sold by the processor. In order to explain the position it is made clear by the following illustration : if the value of the grey-cloth in the hands of the processor is Rs. 20/- and the value of the job-work done is Rs. 5/- and the manufacturing profit and expenses for the processing be Rs. 5/-then in such a case the value would be Rs. 30, being the value of the grey-cloth plus the value of the job-work done, plus manufacturing profit and expenses. That would be the correct assessable-value.
2. If the trader, who entrusts cotton or man-made fabric to the processor for processing on job-work basis, would give a declaration to the processor as to what would be the price at which he would be selling the processed goods in the market, that would be taken by the Excise authorities as the assessable-value of the processed fabric and excise duty would be charged to the processor on that basis provided that the declaration as to the price at which he would be selling the processed goods in the market, would include only the price or deemed price at which the processed fabric would leave the processors factory plus his profit. Rule 174 of the Central Excise Rules,.1944 enjoins that when goods owned by one person are manufactured by another the information is required relating to the price at which the said manufacturer is selling the said goods and the person so authorised agrees to discharge all the liabilities under the said Act and the rules made thereunder. The price at which he is selling the goods must be the value of the grey-cloth or fabric plus the value of the job-work done plus the manufacturing profit and the manufacturing expenses but not any other subsequent profit or expenses. It is necessary to include the processors expenses, costs and charges plus profit, but it is not necessary to include the traders profits who gets the fabrics processed, because those would be post-manufacturing profits.
Order accordingly.
For Citation : AIR 1989 SC 972
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.