SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(SC) 627

B.C.RAY, SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE
Doki China Guruvulu Son And Company – Appellant
Versus
Govt. of A. P. – Respondent


Judgment

SABYASACHI MUKHARJI, J.- Leave granted.

2. This is an appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh, dated November 12, 1986. The appellant challenged the validity of an amendment to the Schedule to the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 (hereinafter called the Act). The appellants are dealers in tamarind in Parvathipuram in Srikakulam district, a border district in Andhra Pradesh. They had purchased tamarind from the State of Orissa paying tax there and incurring expenditure in bringing the said goods to Andhra Pradesh for the purpose of sale. Under the Act, tamarind was Item 14 of Second Schedule and was subjected to sales tax at the point of first purchase in the State irrespective of whether it was purchased within the State or outside the State. The subject matter of challenge in this application under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Andhra Pradesh High Court, was the validity of an amendment to the Schedule to the Act modifying the point of taxability of tamarind in question. Prior to the amendment tamarind was taxable as mentioned hereinbefore as the first purchase point, being Item 14, in the Second Schedule to the Act. Th







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top