SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(SC) 316

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
M. HIDAYATULLAH, C.J.I. AND J.C. SHAH, V. RAMASWAMI AND K.S. HEGDE AND A.N. GROVER, JJ.
M/s. Rattan Lal and co. and another etc. Petitioners
Versus
The Assessing Authority, Patiala and another, etc., Respondents. Pradip Kumar and another, (In W. P. No. 165 of 1968), Interveners.
Writ Petns. Nos. 133, 165, 169 to 172, 185, 218, 219, 227, 228, 230, 239, 252, 253, 248 and 249 of 1968, D/- 29-10-1968.
Advocates appeared
In W. P. No. 133 of 1968: Mr. S. V. Gupte, Sr. Advocate (M/s. S. K. Mehta and K. L. Mehta Advocates of M/s. K. L. Mehta and Co. with him), for Petitioners: In W. P. No. 165 of 1968: Mr. C. D. Garg, Advocate and M./s. S. K. Mehta and K. L. Mehta, Advocate, of M/s. K. L. Mehta and Co., for Petitioners: In W. P. Nos. 169 and 170 of 1968: Mr. Hardev Singh, Advocate, for Petitioners: In W. P. Nos. 171, 172, 218, 219, 227, 228, 230, 239, 248, 249, 252 and 253 of 1968: Mr. V. C. Mahajan, Advocate and M./s. S. J. Mehta and K. L. Mehta Advocates of M/s. K. L. Mehta and Co., for Petitioners; In W. P. No. 185 of 1968: Mr. M. C. Chagla, Sr. Advocate (M/s. A. N. Sinha and B. P. Jha Advocates with him), for Petitioners; In W. P. Nos. 133 and 165 of 1968: Mr. Niren De, Solicitor-General of India, (M/s. O. P. Malhotra and R. B. Sachthey, Advocates with him), for Respondents; In W. P. Nos. 218, 219, 227 and 228 of 1968: Mr. Anand Saroop. Advocate General for the State of Haryana (Mr. R. N. Sachthey, Advocate with him), for Respondents. In W. P. Nos. 169 to 172 of 1968: M/s. O. P. Malhotra and R. N. Sachthey, Advocates, for Respondents; In W. P. Nos. 185, 230, 248, 249, 252 and 253 of 1968: M/s. R. N. Sachthey, Advocate, for Respondents; In W. P. No. 165 of 1968: 1744 Mr. B. Datta, Advocate and Mr. P. C. Bhartari, Advocate for M/s. J. B. Dadachanji and Co., for Interveners.

Advocates:
A.N.SINHA, ANAND SARUP, B.P.JHA, C.D.GARG, HARDEV SINGH, J.B.DADACHAN, K.L.Mehta, M.C.CHAGLA, NIREN DEY, O.P.MALHOTRA, P.C.BHARTARI, R.B.SACHTHEY, R.N.SACH, S.J.MEHTA, S.K.MEHTA, S.V.Gupta, V.C.MAHAJAN

Headnote:

Constitution of India,1950 - Articles 304 , 14 and 19 - Central Act - section 15 - Punjab Amendment Act - Punjab Sales Tax (Haryana Amendment and Validation) Act, 1967 - Companies - Cotton or oil seeds - Tax on sale or purchase - Sales Tax - Petitioners are firms or companies dealing in cotton or oil seeds - Their business is to purchase ginned and unginned cotton for manufacturing yarn and selling said cotton also to registered and unregistered dealers both inside and outside State - Petitioners of second category purchase oil-seeds for use in manufacture of edible oils - Surplus oil-seeds are sold to other dealers, registered or unregistered, inside and outside the State of Punjab - Both these commodities are essential commodities to which Central Sales Tax Act applies - Whether persons from whom appellant purchased cotton, have paid tax or not – Held That is consequence of ad valorem tax being levied at a particular rate - So long as rate is same - Art. 304 is satisfied - Even in case of local manufacturers, if their cost of production varies, net tax collected will be more or less in some cases but that does not create any inequality because inequality is not result of tax but results from cost of production of goods or cost of their importation - This ground, has also no substance – Court do not think it necessary to set down here provisions of Haryana Amendment Act because they follow scheme of Punjab Amendment Act in substance and what Court have said in regard to Punjab Amending Act applies mutatis mutandis to Haryana Amendment Act also - Petitions dismissed.

Judgment

HIDAYATULLAH, C.J.I. : These are 17 petitions challenging the validity of the Punjab General Sales Tax (Amendment and Validation) Act, 1967 (Act No. 7 of 1967) by the Punjab Legislature and the Punjab Sales Tax (Haryana Amendment and Validation) Act, 1967. Thirteen of these petitions challenge the Punjab Amendment Act and four challenge the Haryana Amendment Act.

2. The petitioners are firms or companies dealing in cotton or oil seeds. Their business is to purchase ginned and unginned cotton for manufacturing yarn and selling the said cotton also to registered and unregistered dealers both inside and outside the State. The petitioners of the second category purchase oil-seeds for use in manufacture of edible oils. The surplus oil-seeds are sold to other dealers, registered or unregistered, inside and outside the State of Punjab. Both these commodities are essential commodities to which the Central Sales Tax Act applies. Certain provisions of these Amending Acts are challenged on the ground that they offend section 15 of the Central Act and are also unconstitutional being in violation of Articles 14 and 19.

3. The Punjab General Sales Tax Act was passed in 1948. It was amended from time to time. The Act as it stood on April 1, 1960, was challenged in Bhawani Cotton Mills Ltd. v. State of Punjab, 1967-3 SCR 577 On April 10, 1967 this Court by majority struck down certain portions of the Act on the ground that they were in conflict with the provisions of S. 15 of the Central Act. On November 1, 1966 the former State of Punjab bifurcated and the States of Punjab and Haryana came into existence. On December 29, 1967, the Punjab Legislature enacted Act 7 of 1967 amending the original Act, and the following day the President s Act intituled the Punjab General Sales Tax (Haryana Amendment and Validation) Act, 1967 (Act No. 14 of 1967)was passed for Haryana. Both the Acts were preceded by Ordinances which they replaced. It is not necessary to refer to the Ordinances.

4. Section 15 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 (54 of 1956) provided as follows:

"15. Restrictions and conditions in regard to tax on sale or purchase of declared goods within a State.

Every sales-tax law of a State shall, in so far as it imposes or authorises the imposition of a tax on the sale or purchase of declared goods, be subject to the following restrictions and conditions, namely:

(a) the tax payable under that law in respect of any sale or purchase of such goods inside the State shall not exceed three per cent. of the sale or purchase price thereof, and such tax shall not be levied at more than one stage;

(b) where a tax has been levied under that law in respect of the sale or purchase inside the State of any declared goods and such goods are sold in the course of inter-State trade or commerce, the tax so levied shall be refunded to such person in such manner and subject to such conditions as may be provided in any law in force in that State."

The Section provides that in respect of declared goods the tax (sales or purchase) shall not exceed the prescribed limit and shall not be levied at more than one stage and shall be refunded to persons from whom it is collected if the goods are sold in course of inter-State trade or commerce. The original Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948 was challenged before this Court in Bhawani Cotton Mills Ltd. case,. The Act in defining the taxable turnover in section 5 (2) allowed certain deductions and one such deduction in cl. (vi) was:

"....turnover during that period on the purchase of goods which are sold not later than six months after the close of the year, to a registered dealer, or in the course of inter-State trade or commerce, or in the course of export out of the territory of India:

Provided that in the case of such a sale to a registered dealer, a declaration, in the prescribed form and duly filled and signed by the registered dealer to whom the goods are sold, is furnished by the dealer claiming deduction."

The original

























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top