SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(SC) 546

KULDIP SINGH, S.RANGANATHAN
Collector Of Customs, Bangalore – Appellant
Versus
Hansur Plywood Works – Respondent


Advocates:
A.R.MADHAV RAO, P.P.Rao, V.BALACHANDRAN, V.C.MAHAJAN, V.Sridharan

Judgment

RANGANATHAN, J.:- These are appeals under Section 130E(b) of the Customs Act from an order passed by the Customs, Excise and gold Appellate Tribunal dismissing the appeals preferred by the Collector of Customs in the cases of M/s. Hunsur Plywood Pvt. Ltd. and M/s. Veneer Mills. The question raised involves the interpretation of Notifications Nos. 59/83 and 126/84. These notifications are identically worded in all material respects with Notification No, 265/Cus. dated 8-12-1982 and the question before us is directly governed by our judgment of even date in Civil Appeals Nos. 2644/48 of 1987 (Collector of Customs v. Western India Plywood Manufacturing Co. Ltd.) (reported in AIR 1990 SC 755). For the reasons set out in detail in the said judgment these appeals have to be allowed and the orders of the Assistant Collector rejecting the claims filed by the respondents have to be upheld.

2. When these matters were taken up, Shri V. Sridharan, appearing on behalf of the assessee-respondents, drew our attention to Section 5 of the Customs Tariff Act. He contended that exemptions or concessions in respect of goods imported from certain countries are generally granted in pursuance of a





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top