SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(SC) 123

K.JAYACHANDRA REDDY, S.R.PANDIAN
State of A. P. – Appellant
Versus
P. V. Pavithran – Respondent


Advocates:
C.MARKANDEV, G.Prabhakar, G.SESHAGIRI, H.S.GURU RAJ RAO, K.Madhava Reddy, SUBODH MARKANDAYA, W.A.NAMANI

Judgment

S. RATNAVEL PANDIAN, J.:- The State of Andhra Pradesh represented by the Director, Anti-Corruption Bureau, Hyderabad has filed this criminal appeal challenging the correctness of the Order dated 29-7-88 of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh in Crime No. 7 ACB/ Cr. 11/84 dated 8-3-1984 on the file of the Special Judge for ACB AND SPE quashing the First Information Report in exercise of its inherent powers under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

2. A few facts relevant to decide this case may be stated:-

The respondent was selected to the Indian Police Service in the year 1953 and he worked in various capacities at different places. While he was working as Commissioner of Weights and Measures, Government of Andhra Pradesh, on a report dated 3-7-1984 submitted by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Anti Corruption Bureau, a case was registered against him on 8-3-1984 in Crime No. 7/ AC13/Cr.11/84 under Section 5(2) read with Section 5(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 on the allegations that while functioning as Commissioner of Police and later as Vice-Chairman of Andhra Pradesh Housing Board during the years 1978-82, he indulged in corrupt practices an




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top