A.D.KOSHAL, D.A.DESAI, V.R.KRISHNA IYER
Shankar Chakravarti – Appellant
Versus
Britannia Biscuit Company LTD. – Respondent
What is the proper scope and when should a Labour Court or Industrial Tribunal permit or require additional evidence after a domestic enquiry is found defective in penal termination cases under Section 10 or Section 33? What are the correct procedural stages for addressing the validity of a domestic enquiry and the opportunity to adduce additional evidence as established by Delhi Cloth & General Mills Co. v. Ludh Budh Singh and Cooper Engineering Ltd.? What are the rights and obligations of the employer and tribunal regarding pleading, requests for additional evidence, and the sequence of issues when assessing termination of service under the Industrial Disputes Act?
Key Points: - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!)
Judgment
DESAI, J:- The hollow plea of the employer of an alleged denial of an opportunity (never claim at any stage except in Letters Patent Appeal) to substantiate an alleged misconduct of the workman by evidence alinude has been responsible for dragging a tiny dispute rendering the workman jobless for an unusually long period of more than 7 years to this apex court.
2. Facts now beyond the pale of controversy are few and may be briefly stated. Appellant joined service with the first respondent company (company for short) in August 1963 and was confirmed in March 1964. In October 1970 appellant was drawing a composite salary of Rs. 180/-. An industrial dispute touching the workmen of the company was pending before the Industrial Tribunal, when the events leading to the present appeal occurred. On 1st October, 1970 around 5 p.m. appellant is alleged to have hoisted two red flags atop the Branch Office building simultaneously shouting inflammatory slogans. He is alleged to have threatend the Shift Manager Shree Manik Mukharjee who was on duty at the relevant time. The incident was reported to police. Respondent employer felt aggrieved by such indiscpline exhibited by the appellant an
Punjab National Bank Ltd. v. Workmen
Tin Printers (Pvt.) Ltd. v. industrial tribunal
Delhi Cloth and General Mills Co. v. Ludh Budh Singh
applied : Delhi Cloth and General Mills Co. v. Ludh Budh Singh
relied on : Bharat Bank Ltd. v. Employees of Bharat Bank Ltd.
Indian Iron and Steel Co. v. Workmen
Phulbari Tea Estate v. Workmen
M/s. Sasa Musa Sugar Works (P) Ltd. v. Shobrati Khan
followed : Ritz Theatre (P) Ltd. v. Its Workmen
Workmen v. Motipur Sugar Factory
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.