K.JAYACHANDRA REDDY, S.R.PANDIAN
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
Ex Constable Amrik Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
K. JAYACHANDRA REDDY, J.:—Whether a personal hearing is required before disposing of a petition filed under section 117(2) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (Act for short) against an order of the Summary Security Force Court? This in short is the question involved in this appeal filed by the Union of India.
2. The facts that give rise to this appeal may be noted at the outset. The sole respondent who was working as Mounted Constable in the Border Security Force (BSF for short) was charged for an offence undersection31(b)of the Act for extracting a sum of Rs. 14,000/- from a person without proper authority. A charge-sheet was issued to the respondent. The evidence in support of the same was recorded. Thereafter a Summary Security Force Court as provided under the Act was constituted and the respondent was put on trial on 17-2-88. During the recording of the evidence, though the respondent was given an opportunity to cross-examine the witnesses he declined to do so and according to the enquiring authorities, he pleaded guilty and prayed that a lenient view may be taken. During the trial he was also given an opportunity to examine defence witnesses, if any but he did not
applied : Captain Horish Uppal v. Union of India
S.N. Mukherjee v. Union of India
relied on : Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
State of Haryana v. Ram Kishan
Som Datt Datta v. Union of India
Union of India v. Jyori Prakash Miner
Union of India v. CoL J.N. Sinha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.