SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(SC) 761

K.RAMASWAMY, KULDIP SINGH
Prahlad Rai – Appellant
Versus
Sales Tax Officer, Meerut – Respondent


ORDER:—The appellants were served with two notices by the Sales Tax Officer, Hapur for the recovery of Rs. 34,796 44 and Rs. 12,850/ -on account of intere st on arrears of sales tax. The business firms owned by the ancestors of the appellants fell into arrears in respect of sales tax for the years 1952-53 to 1962-63. The appellants, having inherited the properties of the ancestors, were asked to pay the arrears of sales tax. It is the admitted position that the appellants had paid the said arrears. The above-mentioned notices were only in respect of the interest on the amount of arrears so paid. The appellants challenged the notices by way of a writ petition before the High Court. The High Court dismissed the writ petition. This appeal via special leave petition is against the judgment of the High Court.

2. The U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948 was amended and sub-s. (1 -A) was added to S. 8 of the Act. The amendment was introduced by the U.P. Sales Tax (Second Amendment) Act, 1963 which was enforced with effect from January 25, 1964. Sub-s. (I-A) is as under:-

"(1 -A) If the tax payable u/sub-s. (1) remains unpaid for six months after the expiry of the time specified in the notice of assessm








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top