SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(SC) 31

J.S.VERMA, N.D.OJHA, S.RANGANATHAN
S. P. Gupta – Appellant
Versus
U. P. State Electricity Board – Respondent


Advocates:
A.Mohanty, BINU TARNTA, S.DIXIT

JUDGMENT


RANGANATHAN, J. :— The petitioners were respondents 8 to 11 in writ petition No. 3031 of 1987 before the Allahabad High Court. The said writ petition was disposed of by the High Court on 28-9-1989 following its earlier order in W. P. 1454/76. It appears that, before the writ petition was decided in a manner adverse to the present petitioners, they had not been served with any notice in the writ petition though they were eo nominee parties thereto. The petitioners, therefore, preferred SLP No. 1329 of 1989 before this Court. On 23-11-1989 this SLP was dismissed by this, Bench with the following one line order :

"The Special Leave Petition is dismissed."

Thereafter, the present petitioners filed a Civil Miscellaneous Petition in the SLP, purportedly one seeking clarification of the earlier order of the Court. The following order was passed on this application on 14-12-89 :

"Counsel for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw this application. The application is dismissed as withdrawn."

2. Subsequently, the petitioners had filed a review petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a review of its earlier order on the writ petition. The High Court dismissed the review petitio







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top