SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
B.C. RAY AND N.M. KASLIWAL, JJ.*
S.R. Nayak and another, Petitioners
Versus
Union of India and others, Respondents.
Transferred Case Nos. 61,62 of 1989 and 1 of 1990 (with I.A. Nos. 1 to 3 of 1990) and T.C. Nos. - of 1991 (Arising out of Tra. Petn. Nos. 458-67 of 1990); Spl. Leave Petn. (C) No. 13801 of 1989 with Contempt Ptn. Nos. 121 and 130 of 1989 with Interim Appln. Nos 5 and 6 of 1989 (In Transfer Petn. (C) Nos. 506-507 of 1989)
Decided on 16-4-1991.
AND
Haresh Jagtiani and another, Petitioner
Versus
Union of India and others, Respondents.
AND
Larsen & Toubro Ltd. and others, Petitioners
Versus
A.K. Lakshmi and others, Respondents.
AND
Larsen & Toubro Ltd., Petitioner
Versus
Indian Express Newspapers Bombay Ltd. and others, Respondents.
AND
Larsen & Toubro Ltd., Petitioner
Versus
Haresh Jagtiani and others, Respondents.
AND
Larsen & Toubro Ltd., Petitioner
Versus
Haresh Jagtiani and others, Respondents.
Constitution of India,1950 - Articles 14 and 39(b) and (c) - Companies Act of 1913 – Sections 55, 61 abd 81(A) - Secret agreement - Issue of debentures - Extraordinary general meeting of shareholders of L&T - Shareholder - Large chunk of the equity shares of Larsen & Toubro - High Court of Judicature at Bombay against Union of India and others including financial institutions questioning legality and validity of consent given by Controller of Capital Issues for proposed issue of convertible secured debentures aggregating Rs. 820 crores by Larsen and ToubroLimited insofar as said issue seeks to offer such convertible debentures to persons other than existing shareholders and members and employees of Larsen and Toubro Limited and praying for quashing same as well as for a declaration that transfer of 39 lakh shares of Larsen & Toubro Ltd. held by Unit Trust of India, Life Insurance Corporation of India, General Insurance Company and its subsidiaries to Trishna Investment & Leasing Ltd. through instrumentality of BOB Fiscal Services Ltd. is arbitrary, illegal, mala fide and a fraud on statutory powers of respondents and is clearly ultra vires of Articles 14 and 39(b) and (c) of Constitution on allegations that in or around middle of year 1988 respondents entered into a secret agreement by which a large chunk of equity shares of Larsen & Toubro Ltd - Held, It would not be in interest of general investor public to cancel entire mega issue - Many transactions must have already taken place on the floor of the stock exchange regarding sale and purchase of debentures during this intervening period - Under order of this Court no restrictions were placed on L&T in the matter of utilisation of funds - According to L&T against Rs. 410 crores due on application and allotment, L&T has so far received Rs. 396 crores out of which approximately Rs. 300 crores have been utilised towards issue expenses, capital expenditure, repayment of loans and working capital in terms of the objects of the issue - Balance available with company is approximately Rs. 96 crores only - There is already a safeguard provided in order of CCI that fund utilisation shall be with approval of IDBI - In any case, consent order given by CCI cannot be held invalid on any of grounds of challenge raised by petitioners - Judgment of Bombay High Court also stands modified in accordance with findings and observations recorded by us as mentioned above - Contempt applications are dismissed.
JUDGMENT
RAY, J. :— One Mr. Haresh Jagtiani, a practising advocate of the High Court of Bombay and a policy-holder under the Life Insurance Corporation of India and also holder of units issued by the Unit Trust of India and Mr. Shamit Majumdar, a holder of shares and debentures of Larsen and Toubro Ltd. filed a Writ Petition being No. 2595 of 1989 in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay against the Union of India and others including the financial institutions questioning the legality and validity of the consent given. by the Controller of Capital Issues for the proposed issue of convertible secured debentures aggregating Rs. 820 crores by Larsen and Toubro Limited insofar as the said issue seeks to offer such convertible debentures to persons other than the existing shareholders and members and the employees of Larsen and Toubro Limited and praying for quashing the same as well as for a declaration that the transfer of 39 lakh shares of Larsen & Toubro Ltd. held by Unit Trust of India, Life Insurance Corporation of India, General Insurance Company and its subsidiaries to Trishna Investment & Leasing Ltd. through the instrumentality of BOB Fiscal Services Ltd. is arbitrary, illegal, mala fide and a fraud on the statutory powers of the respondents and is clearly ultra vires of Articles 14 and 39(b) and (c) of the Constitution on the allegations that in or around the middle of the year 1988 the respondents entered into a secret agreement by which a large chunk of the equity shares of Larsen & Toubro Ltd., the largest engineering company in India, would stand surreptitiously divested by the respondents in favour of the Ambani Group, the third largest monopoly house in India. This divestment was achieved not directly but, indirectly and with a motive to conceal the real nature of the deal by interpolating BOB Fiscal Services Ltd. (a wholly owned subsidiary of Bank of Baroda) as the conduit for the transfer of shares from the public financial institutions to the satellite companies of the Ambani Group.
2. The petitioners also alleged in the petition that pursuant to this secret agreement, the following events took place in quick succession
In or around August 1988, four satellite companies of Reliance Group, namely Skylab Detergents Limited, Oskar Chemicals Private Limited, Maxwell Dyes and Chemicals Private Limited and Pro -lab Synthetics Private Limited, gave a total deposit of Rs. 30 crores to an investment company associated with Ambanis who, in turn, deposited this amount with BOB Fiscal Services Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of Bank of Baroda, a nationalised bank.
BOB Fiscal Services Ltd., which had been formed only three months earlier acquired either immediately before the above deposit, or immediately subsequent thereto, 33 lakh equity shares of Larsen & Toubro from UTI, LIC, GIC and its subsidiaries. Later, in January, 1989 it acquired a further 6 lakh shares from the LIC.
Within weeks after the deposit by the four companies mentioned above, Trishna Investments and Leasing Limited, another satellite company of the Ambani Group, paid the requisite amounts for the acquisition of the said 33 lakh shares in Larsen & Toubro from BOB Fiscal Services Ltd. to the latter through a stock broking firm and immediately thereafter the money advanced by the above four companies was returned by BOB Fiscal Services Ltd. through the investment company associated with Ambanis, which was earlier used as a conduit for making the deposit from the four satellite companies of Reliance Group.
The deposit by the four companies was made immediately after the divestment of the shares by the respondents was okayed by the highest level in the Government and the deposit was returned immediately after the Ambani Group was able to divert moneys taken by them in the name of Reliance Petro-chemicals Ltd. by the issue of convertible debentures of the order of Rs. 594 crores.
The said 33 lakh shares were registered in the name of BOB Fiscal Services Ltd. in th
relied on : Narendra Kumar Maheshwari v. Union of India
State of M.P. v. and lal Jaiswal
Union of India v. Tarachand Gupta and Bros.
relied on : S.P. Gupta v. Union of India
Bandhua Mukti Morcha v. Union of India
distinguished : LIC of India v. Escorts Ltd.
referred to : State of Maharashtra v. Ramdas Shriniwas Nayak
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.