K.JAGANNATHA SHETTY, YOGESHWAR DAYAL
Attar Singh Gurmukh Singh – Appellant
Versus
Income Tax Officer, Ludhiana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
K. JAGANNATHA SHETTY, J.:—The assessees in these appeals have made payments in cash exceeding a sum of Rs. 2500/ - for some of the purchases of stock-in-trade. The payments are not allowed as deductions in the computation of income under the head "profits and gains of business". The payments are held to be in contravention of the terms of Section 40A(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 read with the Rule 6DD of the Income-tax Rules, 1962. The assessees have appealed to this Court challenging the disallowance.
2. Two questions arise for consideration in these appeals; (i) The validity of Section 40A(3) of the Act; and (ii) The applicability of Section 40A(3) to payments made for acquiring stock-in-trade.
3. Section 40A(3) so far as material provides:
"40A. Expenses or payments not deductible in certain circumstances- (1) The provisions of this section shall have effect notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in any other provision of this Act relating to the computation of income under the: head "Profit and gains of business or profession."
xxx xxx xxx xxx
(3) Where the assessee incurs any expenditure in respect of which payment is made, after such date (not being later t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.