JUDGMENT

RANGANATHAN, J.:- The devaluation of the Indian Rupee on 6th June, 1966 brought several problems in its wake. One such problem arose out of the consequential enhancement in the liability of an Indian businessman who had imported plant and machinery from abroad, the consideration for which had been fixed in terms of a foreign currency and which had not been fully discharged by the date of devaluation. How this increase in liability has to be (a) accounted for in the books of account of the businessman and (b) taken into account for purposes certain allowances available under the Income-tax Act, 1961, are the two issues that have to be considered in this appeal.

2. A simple hypothetical illustration (steering clear of complications that may arise where the purchase is made by borrowing funds therefore from others, where the price as paid in several instalments, where more than one fluctuation in exchange rate intervener and so on) will serve to bring the problem into focus. Let us consider the case of an income tax assessee, whose previous year ended on 31-3-66, who had placed an order for plant and machinery costing $10,000 on 1-1-1966, at a time when the rupee exchange rate of a dollar was, say ten rupees to the dollar. The cost of the plant or machinery would have been debited by him, in his books for the year ended 31-3-66, at Rupees One Lakh. If the price wholly or in part remained undischarged on 6-5-1966, the assessee would have become liable to pay more money in terms of the Indian Rupee to pay in full the price of $10,000. Let us suppose that he had eventually to pay Rs. 1,20,000 in the accounting year 1966-67 to discharge his liability towards the purchase price. The two questions that would arise are-

(i) Should he enter the additional liability of Rs. 20,000 in his books for the year ended 31-3-67 during which the additional liability arose consequent on the devaluation or should he reopen his accounts of the earlier year and correct the figure of cost debited there in from Rs. 1,00,000 to Rs. 1,20,000?

(ii) On what basis should he claim allowances like depreciation and development rebate under the Income-tax Act which are admissible on the "actual cost to the assessee of such plant and machinery"?

Before dealing with these questions it may be useful to refer to certain accountancy principles and statutory provisions that have a bearing on the issues raised.

3. Soon after the currency devaluation of 1966, the institute of Chartered Accountants of India issued a statement indicating the manner in which the effects of devaluation should be shown in the accounts. It said:

"2.1 Where the accounts of an enterprise are closed on a date prior to 6th June, 1966, but the auditor reports thereon subsequent to that date, the question arises whether it is necessary to include in the accounts or in the auditors report any reference to the fact of Devaluation and its effects upon the accounts of the company. It is accepted in connection With certain matters that events occurring made in the Income-tax Act to enable after the balance sheet date may be of such a nature that they would have to be taken into account in order to show a true and fair view. The council is, therefore, of the opinion that it is the duty of the Directors of a company to disclose by way of a note on the accounts, the effect (if material) of devaluation upon the accounts of the company and in particular about the extent to which the outstanding liabilities may be increased as a result of devaluation and its effect upon the profit or loss of a company.

xxxx xxxx xxxx

2.2 While this is the recommended procedure, it is permissible for a company to include the effects of devaluation in its accounts ending on a date prior to 6th June, 1966. It would be desirable to make appropriate disclosure of the effect of such inclusion on the true and fair view of the results for the year and the position as at the Balance Sheet date in the accounts or in any notes thereon.

x