SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.M. AHMADI AND M.M. PUNCHHI, JJ.
All India Reserve Bank Retired Officers Association and others, Petitioners
Versus
Union of India and others, Respondents
Writ Petn. (Civil) No. 10 of 1991, Dt.10.12.1991.
Advocates appeared :
Mr. P. P. Rao and Mr. A. K. Ganguli, Sr. Advocates, Mr. S. Mandal and Mr. Indranil Ghosh, Advocates with them for Petitioners; Mr. Kapil Sibal, Sr. Advocate and Mr. H. S. Parihar and Mr. K. S. Paribar, Advocates with him, for Respondents.
Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 - Section 58 - Reserve Bank of India Pension Regulations, 1990 - Constitution of India,1950 - Articles 14 ,38, 39, 41 and 43 - Employment and Service - In-service employees i.e. those employees who were actually in service at the date of introduction of the scheme were given an option to opt out of pension scheme and continue to be governed by CPF Scheme - Third category is of those who retired from Banks service between 1st January and November - Regulation 3(3) which deals with the applicability of the scheme to the said category of retired - Employees who were in service as on January (excluding those on leave preparatory to retirement) and had retired before November provided they exercise option to be governed by these Regulations and refund within such period as may be specified Banks contribution to provident fund including interest received by them from the Bank together with simple interest at six per cent per annum from the date of withdrawal till of repayment - Pension shall be payable to them in accordance with Regulation - Held, Besides it has been pointed out by the Bank Authorities that under their manual service details pertaining to an employee who has retired are maintained for five years and thereafter they are destroyed and therefore cut-off date was fixed as - This is clearly brought out affidavit - Secondly this Court had during the pendency of the writ petition, asked both sides to prepare statements showing the financial implications if the cut-off date is removed and the scheme is applied to all retirees - Both sides experienced difficulty for want of service records and whatever calculations were made from scanty service records available with them were disputed - This justifies the reason for not extending the benefit to those who had retired before five years or more - Petition dismissed.
Judgment
AHMADI, J.:- In exercise of powers conferred by Cl.(j) of sub-sec. (2) of S. 58 or the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 (Act II of 1934) (hereinafter called the Act), the Central Board of the Reserve Bank of India with the prior approval of the Central Government framed Regulations known as the Reserve Bank of India Pension Regulations, 1990 (hereinafter called the Regulations). By the said Regulations brought into force with effect from 1st November, 1990 a pension scheme was introduced in substitution of the existing Contributory Provident Fund Scheme (hereinafter alluded to as the CPF Scheme ). The newly introduced pension scheme was made applicable to all employees entering Bank service on or after 1st November, 1990; for them the CPF Scheme did not exist. The in-service employees i.e. those employees who were actually in service at the date of introduction of the scheme were given an option to opt out of the pension scheme and continue to be governed by the CPF Scheme. The third category is of those who retired from Banks service between 1st January, 1986 and 1st November, 1990. Regulation 3(3) which deals with the applicability of the scheme to the said category of retired employees reads as under:
"3(3) Employees who were in service as on 1st January 1986 (excluding those on leave preparatory to retirement) and had retired before 1st November, 1990, provided they exercise option to be governed by these Regulations and refund, within such period as may be specified, the Banks contribution to provident fund including interest received by them from the Bank together with simple interest at six per cent per annum from the date of withdrawal till the date of repayment. Pension shall be payable to them in accordance with Regulation 31."
Regulation 31 reads as under:
"31. Employees who have retired from the Banks service on or after 1st January, 1986 and before 1st November, 1990 shall be eligible for pension from 1st November, 1990 or after expiry of leave preparatory to retirement subject to Regulation 22. The payment of pension shall be subject to their refunding Banks contribution to provident fund including interest received by them from the Bank, together with simple interest at the rate of six per cent per annum from the date of withdrawal till the date of repayment. Such employees will be permitted to commute their pension also with effect from 1st November, 1990, after due medical examination."
It, therefore, appears on a conjoint reading of Regulation 3(3) and Regulation 31 that Bank employees who retired from service between 1st January, 1986 and 1st November, 1990 could opt for the benefit of the pension scheme with effect from 1st November, 1990 provided they refunded the Banks contribution to the provident fund together with interest received thereon and together with further interest calculated at 6 per cent per annum from the date of withdrawal till the date of repayment. Bank employees who retired from service before 1st January, 1986 were not eligible to opt for the newly introduced pension scheme.
2. Petitioner No.1 is an Association of retired Bank employees and petitioners Nos. 2 to 7 are its members who retired from the Banks service on or before 31st December, 1985. They are not entitled to opt for the pension-plan under the aforesaid Regulations. They contend that the cut-off date fixed under Regulations 3(3) and 31 extracted earlier is wholly artificial and has no relation to the object sought to be achieved by the introduction of the pension-plan in substitution of the extant CPF scheme. They contend that Article 14 of the Constitution forbids class legislation and the Bank Authorities have by drawing an artificial classification between those who retired on or before 31st December, 1985 and those who retired 24 hours later i.e. on or after 1st Janary, 1986 have violated the letter and spirit of the said article of the Constitution. Although Article 14 permits reasonable classification, that classi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.