R.M.SAHAI, S.MOHAN
Bileshwar Khan Udyog Khedut Shahakari Mandali LTD. – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
Judgment
R.M. SAHAI, J.:- Validity of demand, under Section 58A of the Bombay Prohibition Act, for maintenance of the excise staff for supervision of the manufacture of industrial alcohol was assailed on lack of legislative competence of the State.
2. Section 58A is extracted below:
"58A : The State Government may by general or special order direct that the manufacture, import, export, transport, storage, sale, purchase, use, collection or cultivation of any intoxicant, denatured spirituous preparations, hemp, Mowra flowers, or molasses shall be under the supervision of such Prohibition and Excise or Police Staff as it may deem proper to appoint, and that the cost of such staff shall be paid to the State Govt. by person manufacturing, importing, exporting, transporting, storing, selling, purchasing, using, collecting or cultivating the intoxicant, denatured spirituous preparation, hemp, Mhowra flowers or molasses:
Provided that the State Government may exempt any class of persons or institutions from paying the whole or any part of the cost of such staff."
Rule 2 of Bombay Prohibition (Manufacture of Spirit) (Gujarat) Rules, 1963, framed by the State of Gujarat empowered the director to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.