SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(SC) 93

R.M.SAHAI, S.MOHAN
Bileshwar Khan Udyog Khedut Shahakari Mandali LTD. – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent


Advocates:
Anip Sachthey, D.N.Mishra, JOSEPH VELLAPALLY, R.N.SACH, RASHMI DHARIWAL

Judgment

R.M. SAHAI, J.:- Validity of demand, under Section 58A of the Bombay Prohibition Act, for maintenance of the excise staff for supervision of the manufacture of industrial alcohol was assailed on lack of legislative competence of the State.

2. Section 58A is extracted below:

"58A : The State Government may by general or special order direct that the manufacture, import, export, transport, storage, sale, purchase, use, collection or cultivation of any intoxicant, denatured spirituous preparations, hemp, Mowra flowers, or molasses shall be under the supervision of such Prohibition and Excise or Police Staff as it may deem proper to appoint, and that the cost of such staff shall be paid to the State Govt. by person manufacturing, importing, exporting, transporting, storing, selling, purchasing, using, collecting or cultivating the intoxicant, denatured spirituous preparation, hemp, Mhowra flowers or molasses:

Provided that the State Government may exempt any class of persons or institutions from paying the whole or any part of the cost of such staff."

Rule 2 of Bombay Prohibition (Manufacture of Spirit) (Gujarat) Rules, 1963, framed by the State of Gujarat empowered the director to


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top