SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(SC) 131

N.M.KASLIWAL, R.M.SAHAI
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
C. L. Verma – Respondent


Advocates:
INDIRA JAISINGH, Mukul Mudgal, R.SASIPRABHU, V.R.REDDY, VIJAY VERMA

Judgment

KASLIWAL, J.:- Delay condoned.

2. Special leave granted.

2A. The respondent C. L. Verma was an employee of Western Railway, Church Gate, Bombay. He was served with a charge-sheet dated 30-9-1983. He was dismissed from Railway service with effect from 29-8-1985 by the disciplinary authority. An appeal filed by the respondent was dismissed by the President of India vide order dated 21-8-1986. The respondent challenged his dismissal in the Central Administrative Tribunal. The Tribunal by an order dated 8-8-1991 set aside the order of dismissal on the ground that the respondent was not supplied the copy of the Enquiry Officers report. The Tribunal placed reliance on a decision of this Court in Union of India v. Mohd. Ramzan Khan (1991) 1 SCC 588. The Tribunal considered the effect of the observations made in Mohd. Ramzans case (supra) that the said decision shall have prospective application and no punishment imposed shall be open to challenge on this ground. The Tribunal in this regard held that no inference can be drawn from the observations made by the Honble SC in Ramzan Khans case (supra) that all the pending matters will also abate. The Tribunal further held as under :-

"Thu












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top