SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 826

K.RAMASWAMY, B.L.HANSARIA
Special Land Acquisition Officer, Malaprabha Dam Project, Saundatti – Appellant
Versus
Madivalappa Basalingappa Melavanki – Respondent


Advocates:
M.VIRAPPA

ORDER

1. Leave granted.

2. The Court of Civil Judge in LAC Nos. 263 and batch by award and decree dated 14-12-1981 enhanced the compensation determined by the Land Acquisition Officer from Rs 3000 per acre to Rs 15,000 per acre. On appeal, under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act (for short, the Act) the Second Additional District Judge, Belgaum by his common judgment dated 25-8-1983 confirmed the same. The High Court by the impugned order dated 29-1-1988 in Miscellaneous Second Appeal No. 44 of 1985 and batch held that in determining compensation on the basis of the annual yield by application of 15 years multiplier would be illegal, as held in Special Land Acquisition Officer v. P. Veerabhadarappa{(1984) 2 SCC 120. As for this decision, appropriate multiplier is 10. This view was reiterated in a number of decisions.

3. However, the learned Judge declined to interfere with the order on the ground that the land in acquisition in this case was only of an extent of 38 gunthas and it was held that "it is hardly appropriate to interfere with the award notwithstanding the discernible blemish pointed out by the learned Government Pleader". The learned Judge also applied the provisions o



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top