SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(SC) 268

J.S.VERMA, KULDIP SINGH
State Of Maharashtra – Appellant
Versus
Abdul Hamid Haji Mohammed – Respondent


JUDGMENT

J.S. Verma, J. - This appeals by a certificate under Article 134 A of the Constitution of India granted by the Bombay High Court to appeal against its judgment dated 18.1.1994 in Criminal Writ Petition No. 902 of 1993 quashing the proceedings under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (heceinafter referred to as the "TADA Act) against respondent Abdul Hamid Haji Mohammed on the ground that lie provisions of TADA -Act are not attracted to the allegations against him. In the chargesheet dated 4.11.1993 filed in the Designated Court, Greater Bombay alleging the commission of offences punishable under the TADA Act by the 189 accused named therein, respondent Abdul Hamid is shown as accused No. 61. In the impugned judgment dated 18.1.1994, the High Court has held that the provisions of TADA Act are not attracted to the case against the respondent and consequently the proceedings against him before the Designated Court under the TADA Act have been quashed. Consequently, the High Court has directed the release of the petitioner on bail on terms mentioned in its judgment.

2. The city of Bombay was rocked by a series of bomb blasts on 12.3.1993 which kil














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top