JUDGMENT

K. Ramaswamy J. - The facts in these cases bring to focus the mixed blend of efficacy of pragmatic procedure under s. 32; absolute disregard for truth; rank indiscipline among the so-called discipline police force, despite scientific advancement persistence of crude methods of investigation; depraved conduct of the official to forge signatures of higher official an the complicity of persons who moved this Court callously compromise with the officials to speak contrary to the facts placed before the ,Court. A practicing Advocate is no exception. He had sworn to an affidavit but not even slightest hesitation to make a somersault and deny his averments made in the sworn affidavit filed in this Court. These disturbing trends cause not only a deep anguish to this Court of the degeneration in the moral and official conduct but also feel difficult to place absolute reliance on affidavit evidence placed on record.

2. The objective report of Mr. Kalyan Rudra, Director-General of Police, Haryana, and his affidavit dated November 2, 1993 filed pursuant the directions of this Court dated November 2, 1993 and the report of D.R. Aneja, the learned District Judge, Faridabad, submitted