SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 478

ARIJIT PASAYAT, S.H.KAPADIA
Secretary, A. P. Public Service Commission – Appellant
Versus
B. Swapna – Respondent


Judgment

Arijit Pasayat, J.—Leave granted.

2. The Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Commission’) calls in question legality of the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of the Andhra Pradesh High Court affirming the judgment of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal (in short ‘Tribunal’).

3. The controversy involved in the present appeal arises in the following background:

The appellant-Commission by its advertisement No. 13/94 dated 17.1.1995 advertised for filling up 8 posts of Assistant Public Relations Officers. Subsequently, 7 more vacancies were advertised. Therefore, the recruitment was made for 15 vacancies. There were 5 zones namely, Zones I to V for which selections were to be made in the following ­manner:

Zone Community No. of vacancies

I OC 2

BC-B 1

II OC 2

BC-B 1

III OC 1

BC-A 1













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top