SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 926

S.C.AGRAWAL, S.SAGHIR AHMAD
Krushna Chandra Sahu – Appellant
Versus
State Of Orissa – Respondent


Advocates:
A.K.PANDEY, A.MARIAPUTHAM, ARUNA MATHUR, C.S.S.RAO, J.S.VAD, P.N.MISHRA

JUDGMENT

S. SAGHIR AHMAD, J.

(1) SPECIAL leave granted.

(2) THE controversy in these cases relates to the appointment of the appellants in Civil No. 8164 of 1995 arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No. 13002 of 1990 as junior teachers in Dr Abin Chand Homoeopathic Medical College and Hospital, Bhubaneswar (for short, College) affiliated to the Utkal University who, since their appointment, are constantly involved in litigation as their appointments were first challenged in two writ petitions namely, OJCs Nos. 2217 of 1984 and 19 of 1985 in the orissa High court which by its judgment and order dated 30/7/1985 partially allowed the petitions and quashed their selection on the ground that the Selection Board was not constituted in accordance with the provisions contained in Rule 5(1 of the orissa Homoeopathy Medical Teaching Service (Methods of Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1980 and issued directions for fresh selection and thereafter when the petitioners were again selected, their appointment, this time, was challenged before the orissa Administrative tribunal which, by its judgment and order dated 14/5/1990 quashed their appointment

































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top