SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 870

R. C. LAHOTI, H. K. SEMA, G. P. MATHUR
K. Vidya Sagar – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Judgment

G.P. Mathur, J.—This petition under Article 32 of the Constitution has been filed praying for a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or other directions be issued to:-

“a) Conduct an inquiry by any Hon’ble Judge of the Hon’ble High Court or an independent and impartial Authority regarding the FIR 521 dt. 9.7.98 lodged at Sector 20 P.S. Noida and the harassment caused to the petitioner for the last six years and grant compensation to the petitioner for rehabilitation at Delhi.

b) grant compensation to the petitioner for a further period of two years for restoration of his earlier practice and for settling in Delhi with his family.

c) Conduct an inquiry into the loss caused to Y. Pitchaiah the client of the petitioner whose original record was stolen by the accused after he fought the litigation for 15 years in the courts below.

d) Conduct an inquiry by any Hon’ble Judge of the Hon’ble High Court or an independent and impartial Authority regarding six years of delay in prosecuting the accused especially with reference to the proceedings in Crl. Revision No. 33/2002 at Dehradun in the State of Uttaranchal.

e) Direct the Special Magistrate, C.B.I. Cases






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top