SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
P.N. Bhagwati, CJI., RANGANATHAN MISRA, J.
Civil Appeal No. 626 of 1986, etc. D/- 19-12-1986.
Pournami Oil Mills, etc., Appellants
Versus
State of Kerala, another, Respondents.
Kerala General Sales Tax Act – Section 10 – Promote industrial growth - Lack of availability of raw materials - Inadequate to attract industries - Incentives now given to industries in State are too meagre and inadequate to attract industries to this State when compared to incentives available for industries in many other States there are certain inherent disincentives also peculiar to this State such as high wage rates minimum wages for certain sections, lack of availability of raw materials question of offering some incentives by State to attract new industries has been under consideration of Government – Question whether any additional incentive can be given to industrial concern State plans to consider in detail and it was felt that question of strengthening traditional industries which are labour-intensive rehabilitation of sick units and promotional activities for growth of new industries should be examined in depth for identifying problems and adoption of various measures necessary to promote industrial growth in State – Held, Second notification withdrew exemption relating to purchase tax and confined exemption from sales tax to limit specified in proviso of Notification – All parties before us who in response to their industries prior within State of Kerala would thus be entitled to exemption extended and/or promised under that Order – Such exemption would continue for full period of five years from date they started production – New industries obviously would not be entitled to that benefit as they had notice of curtailment in exemption before they came to set up their industries – Course of hearing and in written submissions furnished on behalf of State it was contended that question as to which of appellants are entitled to benefit should be left to Sales Tax Authorities to decide are of view that once law is settled that part of decision may be left to Departmental authorities and they may decide question on merits in appropriate proceeding in accordance with law laid down in this judgment – Appeals allowed.
Judgment
RANGANATH MISRA, J. :- All these appeals are by special leave and are directed against judgments rendered by the Kerala High Court in Writ Petitions filed before it. The High Court in each case refused to grant relief.
2. Two Notifications/Orders issued by the State Government are relevant. The first one is dated 11-4-1979 and the second is dated 29-9-1980 which was published in the State Gazette on 21-10-1980. For convenience, the texts of the two Notifications/Orders are extracted below :
"Order dated 11-4-1979 :
The incentives now given to the industries in the State are too meagre and inadequate to attract industries to this State when compared to the incentives available for the industries in many other States. Further there are certain inherent disincentives also peculiar to this State such as high wage rates, minimum wages for certain sections, lack of availability of raw materials, etc. The question of offering some incentives by the State to attract new industries has been under consideration of the Government.
The question whether any additional incentive can be given to the industrial concern the State plans to consider in detail and it was felt that the question of strengthening the traditional, industries which are labour-intensive, rehabilitation of sick units and the promotional activities for the growth of new industries should be examined in depth for identifying the problems and adoption of various measures necessary to promote industrial growth in the State. A Committee consisting of the following officers was therefore set up to study the various problems and submit report ............"
The Committee finalised its report on 20th March 1979. The Government has considered the recommendations and suggestions of the Committee in detail and they are pleased to approve the following package of measures for promoting industrial development in Kerala :
Small Scale Industries:
Sales Tax Concessions :
New industrial units under small-scale industries set up after 1-4-1979 will be exempted from the payment of sales tax for a period of five years from the date of production ...............
3. The relevant portion of the second notification reads thus :
"In exercise of the power conferred by section 10 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act (15 of 1963) the Government of Kerala have considered it necessary in the public interest so to do, hereby make an exemption in respect of the tax payable under the said Act on the turnover of the sale of goods produced and sold by the new industrial units under the small-scale industries for a period of five years from the date of commencement of sale of such goods by the said units subject to the conditions that if the tax collected by any such units by way of tax on their sales shall be said over to Government and that the sales tax, if any, already paid by such units to Government shall not be refunded.
Provided that such units shall produce proceedings of the General Manager, District Industries Centre, declaring the eligibility of the units for claiming exemption from sales tax.
Provided further that the cumulative sales tax concessions granted to a unit at any point of time within this period shall not exceed 90 per cent of the cumulative gross fixed capital investment of the unit.
Explanation :- For the purpose of this notification new industrial unit under the Small-scale Industries shall mean undertakings set up on or after 1st April, 1979 and registered with the Department of Industries and Commerce as a small-scale industrial unit.
This notification shall be deemed to have come into force with effect from 1st April, 1979".
4. Section 10, Kerala General Sales Tax Act, at the time the two orders were made ran thus :
"Power of Government to grant exemption and reduction in rate of tax :
(1) The Government may, if they consider it necessary in the public interest, by notification in the Gazette, make an exemption or reduction in rate (either prospectively or retrospectively) in respect
applied : Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. v. State of U.P.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.