SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(SC) 561

O. CHINNAPPA REDDY AND K. JAGANNATHA SHETTY, JJ.
Civil Appeal No. 1112 of 1980, D/- 20-7-1987.
Smt. Gulwant Kaur and another, Appellants
Versus
Mohinder Singh and others, Respondents.

Advocates:
HARBANS SINGH, KAMINI JAISWAL, S.K.Bagga, V.M.TARKUNDE

Headnote:

Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Section 14, 14(l), 14(2) - Maintenance - Land Given - In Lieu Of Maintenance - Major General Gurbux Singh and his wife Gulwant Kaur were estranged and were living apart - Their son and daughter-in-law were living with Gulwant Kaur at Chandigarh - Gulwant Kaur was apparently complaining that Major General Gurbux Singh was not providing her with adequate maintenance – Whether Major General Gurbux Singh intended to give away Khurana land absolutely to Gulwant Kaur but whether land was given to her in lieu of maintenance - Held, It is evident that legislature has abolished concept of limited ownership in respect of a Hindu female and has enacted that any property possessed by her would thereafter be held by her as a full owner - Section 14(l) would come into operation if property (sic) at point of time when she has an occasion to claim or assert a title thereto - Or, in other words, at point of time when her right to said property is called into question - Legal effect of S.14(l) would be that after the coming into operation of Act there would be no property in respect of which it could be contended by anyone that a Hindu female is only a limited owner and not a full owner – Court is for moment not concerned with fact that sub-sec. (2) of S. 14 which provides that S. 14(l) will not prevent creating a restricted estate in favour of a Hindu female either by gift or will or any instrument or decree of a civil court or award provided very document creating title unto her confers a restricted estate on her -There is nothing in S. 14 which supports proposition that a Hindu female should be in actual physical possession or in constructive possession of any property on date of coming into operation of Act - Expression proposed has been used in sense of having power a right to property or control over property - Appeal allowed.

Judgement

CHINNAPPA REDDY, J.:- Major General Gurbux Singh and his wife Gulwant Kaur were estranged and were living apart. Their son and daughter-in-law were living with Gulwant Kaur at Chandigarh. Gulwant Kaur was apparently complaining that Major General Gurbux Singh was not providing her with adequate maintenance. Therefore, on July 28, 1958, he wrote her a letter, the relevant parts of which are as follows

"To,

Shrimati Gulwant Kaur,

You have been complaining that I have not paid even a penny for maintenance for the last seven/eight months. Here is an account from November 1957 to July, 1958, the details of which run as under :

x x x x x x x x x x

Now, so far as the question of future expenses is concerned, the maintenance shall be like this :

For Yourself;

1. The land and house situated at Mangwal, which was constructed with the earning of my whole life is entrusted to you, the half portion of which already stands in your name and in lieu of the produce thereof Madanjit shall provide to you, if not more, free lodging and boarding (expenses for maintenance). You stay in your own home.

2. The land at Khurana is also entrusted to you. Its produce, lease money, etc. will fetch you a minimum of Rs. 1200/- annually i.e. Rs. 100/- per month for maintenance.

3. 1 shall pay Rs. 100/- every month for maintenance.

x x x x x x x x x x"

The letter of Gurbux Singh suggested that he was making adequate provision for meeting the expenses of Gulwant Kaur even at the cost of great inconvenience and discomfort to himself and so Gulwant Kaur was not entitled to complain. Gulwant Kaur apparently felt disgusted and frustrated at the tone of the letter and by her letter dated August 5, 1958, she queried if she was not to take maintenance from Gurbux Singh from who else was she to get any maintenance. She said that she was not demanding anything and made no claim on him and that everything including the land and Kothi belonged to him. The Khurana land also belonged to him. He might give her maintenance or not give her maintenance as he chose. She said that she was nothing more than a heap of dust and her life was not worth living. In another portion of the letter, she mentioned that the Khurana land had not yet been leased and that there had been some delay. Other correspondence passed between the parties which is not important for the present case. Later, after a few years, Gurbux Singh conceived the idea of selling the Khurana land. The wife protested. Her letter dated January 15, 1966 was as follows :-

"Most respected husband.

Sat Siri Akal,

Previously in the summer, Col. Gurcharan Singh told us that you want to sell the land of Khurana. Now, on the day you visited Sangrur, it was learnt from you that you were interested in selling the land. I also told you that we depend upon only that. This land was given to me by you voluntarily. You had written letters to me and Madanjit on July 28, 1958 copy whereof is being sent to you by me. Therein, it was decided that I would continue enjoying the produce thereof till my life . Now, on hearing that you want to sell it, I was very much shocked ................ Now this letter is being written to you in order to impress upon you not to sell the land of Khurana because Madanjit and I depend upon it. You are very well aware that we do not possess anything else ............. I fully hope that you will continue giving me this land and the maintenance grants to me as per your decision and will not think of selling this land. You are aware how we are hardly maintaining ourselves. I have made this prayer to you. I have full right over it. I hope that you will reply soon."

Gulwant Kaurs letter did not have any effect on Major General Gurbux Singh. Instead of replying her, he sold the Khurana land to the plaintiff-respondent on June 18, 1968. The purchaser instituted


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top