SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
B.P.Sinha, C.J.I., K.N.Wanchoo, P.B.Gajendragadkar, JJ.
Raipur Manufacturing Company, Limited, Ahmedabad
Versus
Nagrashna (M.N.)
Case No. : 38 of 1958
Date of Decision : 10/29/59
K.N.Wanchoo, J.
(1) THIS is an appeal by special leave against the judgment of the Bombay High court by which the writ petition filed by the appellant was summarily dismissed. The brief facts necessary for the purpose of this appeal are these: The appellant Is a cotton mill In Ahmedabad. Respondents 2 (a) to 2 (n) are the fourteen employees of the appellant designated as grey-folders. Under the Bombay Industrial Disputes Act, 1938 (since repealed by the Bombay Industrial Relations Act, No. XI of 1947, which came Into force on 15/04/1947), the Registrar had made a notification recognizing various occupations in cotton textile mills. Folders were put In group "F" of this notification while clerks were pat in group "H." In December 1946, the Textile Labour Association of Ahmedabad gave a notice of change to the Millowners Association for standardization of wages of the various occupations In the cotton textile Industry. Thereupon a reference was made by the State government in June 1947 to the industrial court, which, by the first part of its award, fixed wages for grey-folders doing catlooking work at Ra. 42-4-0 per mensem. Later the same court gave the second part of Its award relating to clerks in October 1948. In April 1949, the Textile Labour A.asociation gave a notice terminating the award under S. 116 of the Bombay Industrial Relations Act and the award came to an end in June 1949. Thereafter under S. 42 (2) of the Bombay Industrial Relations Act, there was a notice of change by the Textile Labour Association for revision of payscales. In pursuance of this notice there was an agreement between the Ahmedabad Millowers Associaton and the Textils Labour Association on 22 Jane 1949. This agreement waa to apply to all the cotton mills in Ahmedaba.r1. Clause (4) of this agreement provided payacales for clerks who were divided into three categories. Then came 01. (6) with which we are concerned in this appeal. It runs as under : "A separate scale for those of the employees who occupy the position lower than that of a full-fledged clerk but higher than that of an operative will be provided as under: 40-3-70-BB-4-90-5-105. This scale will be applicable in case of ticket boys, ticket checkers, coupon sellers, tally boys. production checkers, thread counters, cloth measurers, department store-man, cut-lookers, and those who have not been included above but who ca,n properly fall under the above category."
(2) GREY-FOLDERS, however, not being specifically mentioned in Cl. (5) continued to be paid Ra. 42-4-0 per month a.a fixed by the first part of the award of the industrial court referred to above. Consequently in January 1950, the fourteen respondents who are grey-folders, applied under S. 79 of the Bombay Industrial Relations Act to the labour court that they were not being paid the grade fixed by Cl. (5) of the agreement and thia amounted to an unlawful change by the employer and that it should be ordered to withdraw such an illegal change. This application was dismissed by the labour court In April 1952. It waa of opinion that the evidence showed beyond all doubt that the applicants before It were operatives and could not be considered as clerks who were doing routine work of writing copying or making calculations. There was an obvious error in this view of the labour court for the grey-foldera bad not claimed before it that they were clerks, for in that case they would have claimed wages under Cl. (4) of the agreement ; their case was that they held a.n intermediate position between clerks and operatives and wf re thus covered by Cl. (5) which provided for such anintermediate grade. However, no further steps were taken by the grey-folders against this order of the labour court, by way of appeal or otherwise. In the mean time, the greyfolders applied under S. 118A of the Bombay Industrial Relations Act for modification of award of the industrial court relating to folders. This application was withdraw
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.