SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
P.B.Gajendragadkar, C.J.I., K.N.Wanchoo, M.Hidayatullah, V.Ramaswami, JJ.
Ahmedabad Mill Owners Association: State Of Gujarat
Versus
Textile Labour Association
Case No. : 167 , 173 of 1965
Date of Decision : 8/10/65
Advocates Appeared: Achar B.R.G.K. : Barot N.M. : Buch A.N. : Chaudhuri K.R. : Dadachanji J.B. : Daphtary C.K. : Dapthary C.K. : Hathi K.L. : Kolah R.J. : Mathur O.C. : Nanavati I.M. : Narain Ravinder : Narain Ravindra : Narayanaswamy B. : Palkhivala N.A. : Rai G.B. : Ramanujam G. : Setalvad M.C. : Shaikh N.H. : Shukla R.M. : Sowani H.K. : Trivedi D.T. : Vasavada S.R.
GAJENDRAGADKAR. C.J.I.
(1) THIS is a group of seven appeals which arise from an industrial dispute between the appellants, the Ahmedabad Millowners Association, Ahmedabad, and 67 employers on the one hand, and the respondent, the Textile Labour Association, Ahmedabad, on the other. This dispute was referred by the government of Gujarat to the Industrial court, Gujarat, under section 73 of the Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 (No. XI of 1947) (hereinafter called the Act). In making the order of reference, the government stated that it was satisfied that the industrial dispute in question was not likely to be settled by other means. The dispute itself consisted of three questions. These questions have been thus stated in the reference :`(1) Whether under the award of the Industrial court, Bombay, dated the 2/03/1950, in Reference (1C) No. 189 of 1949 (as subsequently modified) read with award of the Industrial court dated the 27/04/1948, in Revision Petition No. Misc. 1 of 1947, the Ahmedabad Millowners Association and the emploers mentioned in the Annx. are bound to payness allowance to their employees on the Consumer Price Index Numbers for working class for Ahmedabad published by the State government since February, 1964, by using the index numbers in the series for Ahmedabad compiled by the Labour Bureau, Simla, and the linking factor of 3.17 adopted for linking that series to the State series with the old base; (2) If not, whether the said Ahmedabad Millowners Association and the employers mentioned in the Anexure should pay dearness allowance to their employees for March, 1964 and subsequent months in terms of the aforesaid awards, by treating the index numbers for working class for Ahmedabad published by the State government since February, 1964, as the index numbers in the State series compiled on the basis of the family budget survey made in 1926-27; (3) If not, how the dearness allowance to the aforesaid employees for March 1964 and onwards should be paid on the index numbers for Ahmedabad published by the State government since February, 1964`.
(2) THE Industrial court has answered the first question in favour of the appellants, whereas the two remaining questions have been answered in favour of the respondent. In the result, the appellants have been directed to pay dearness allowance to their employees for the month of March, 1964 and for subsequent months on the consumer price index numbers for working class for Ahmedabad published by the State government since February, 1964, (by using the index numbers in the series for Ahmedabad compiled by the Labour Bureau, Simla, and the linking factor of 3.17 adopted for linking that series to the State series with the old base) at the rate of 2.84 piesper day for rise of each point in the cost of living index number over the pre-war figure 73. The Industrial court has further directed that as per the award in Miscellaneous Application (1C-G) No. 1 of 1960, 75% of the average dearness allowance of the first six months of 1959, i.e., Rs. 63-15-9 per month of 26 working days, shall be consolidated with the basic wage and the difference between the dearness allowance as worked out as indicated and the said sum of Rs. 63-15-9 shall be continued to be paid as dearness allowance. The other terms and conditions in regard to payment of wages, including the dearness allowance, shall continue as under the existing award. The Industrial court has made it clear that these directions should be given effect to from 1st of January, 1965 and the difference between what is paid and what has become payable under the present award shall be paid on or before 30/04/1965. It appears that before the Industrial court an agreement had been reached between the Fine Knitting Co. Ltd. of Ahmedabad and the Textile Labour Association, and the award has, therefore, provided that the directions issued by it shall apply only to the spinning department of the Fine Knitting Co
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.