SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(SC) 242

A. N. GROVER, G. K. MITTER, M. HIDAYATULLAH
Tej Bahadur Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


A.N.GROVER, J.

(1) THREE persons, Bechu Singh, Tej Bahadur Singh and Bans Bahadur Singh, were convicted by a Magistrate, First Class, Bara Banki, under Section 9 of the Opium Act. A sentence of two years rigorous imprisonment and payment of fine of Rs. 2,000.00 was imposed on each one of them. In de- fault of payment of fine it was directed that each would have to undergo rigo- rous imprisonment for six months. The Sessions Judge on appeal acquitted Bans Bahadur Singh but confirmed the conviction and the sentence of the other two. The High court dismissed the petition for revision filed by Bechu Singh and the appellant Tej Bahadur Singh. The present appeal has been filed by special leave by Tej Bahadur Singh alone.

(2) THE facts may bestated. On 14/06/1963, Sarkar, P. W. I, Deputy Superintendent central Excise, received information that the appellant and the two others were carrying on smuggling of opium on a large scale and that they had a huge stock of that article at their house in village Birapur. Sarkar organised a raiding party and on 15/06/1963, went to village Birapur. Two persons Vishum Parag and Manak Saran joined the party on the way. The raiding party arri




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top