SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(SC) 510

K. S. HEGDE, J. C. SHAH, G. K. MITTER, A. N. RAY, A. N. GROVER
Prabhakar Shankar Dhuri – Appellant
Versus
S. G. Pradhan – Respondent


J.C.Shah, C.J.I.

(1) WE have heard detailed arguments on the questions whether the Maharashtra Preventive Detention Act No. 18 of 1970 infringes the guarantee of the fundamental freedom under Articles 19,21 and 22 of the Constitution. We have also heard arguments as to the nature of the jurisdiction exercised by the Advisory Board and by the State government in dealing with the representation made by the detenu detained under the Act. We do not however think it necessary to express any opinion on those questions.

(2) CERTAIN facts disclosed by the record clearly indicate that the petitioner is entitled to be released.

(3) BY order of the Commissioner of Police, dated 24/04/1970, the petitioner was detained and he was taken into custody on the very day. He prepared a representation to be submitted to the government of Maharashtra on 1/05/1970. The representation was despatched on 8/05/1970. It was received on 9/05/1970, by the government of Maharashtra. Under S. 11 of the Act it was obligatory upon the government to refer the case to the Advisory Board within 30 days of the date of detention under the Order. By S. 8 of the Act it is provided that

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top