SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(SC) 122

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Y.V. Chandrachud, CJI., D.A.Desai, M.H.Beg, P.N.Bhagwati, P.N. Shinghal, M.Fazal Ali Syed, V.R.Krishna Iyer, JJ.
Madan Mohan Pathak: Ram Parkash Manchanda
Versus
Union Of India
Case No., 108 of 1976,174 , 177 of 1976
Date of Decision, 2/21/78
Advocates Appeared: Agrawal S.C., Chatterjee P.K., Chatterjee Somnath, Das Rathin, Garg R.K., Gupta Aruneshwar, Gupta S.V., Khera P.S., Lalit U.R., Mishra D.N., Sachthey R.N., Subhashini A.

Advocates:
G.B.PAI, K.J.JOHN, K.L.Hathi, O.C.MATHUR, P.C.KAPUR, S.C.PATEL, V.M.TARKUNDE

Headnote:

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 – Sections 2, 10 and 18 - Demand For Dearness Allowance - Settlement - In written statement filed by it appellant company not only challenged locus standi of employees union to raise any demand on behalf of workmen or to support demands raised in view of aforesaid settlement but also maintained that in view of said settlement which continued to be in operation was precluded from raising any dispute in respect of demands which are subject-matter of reference to tribunal for adjudication - ft further contended that as benefit accruing from settlement had been and was being taken by all workmen reference was incompetent and tribunal had no jurisdiction to adjudicate upon demands incorporated therein - While it resisted first four demands raised on mere technicalities with regard to demand for variable dearness allowance – Held, It cannot also be lost sight of that with march of time narrow concept of industry-cum-region is fast changing and look much importance cannot be attached to region - Modern trends in industrial law seem to lay greater accent on similarity of industry rather than on region - It was observed by this court that where there are no comparable concerns in same industry in region tribunal can look to concerns in other industries in region for comparison but in that case such concerns should be as similar as possible and not disproportionately large or absolutely dissimilar - On parity of reasoning it is reasonable to conclude that where there are no comparable concerns engaged in similar industry in region it is permissible for Industrial tribunal or court to look to such similar industries or industries as nearly similar as possible in adjoining or other region in State having similar economic conditions - Appeal is dismissed.

JASWANT SINGH, J.

(1) THIS appeal by special leave is directed against the award dated 21/02/1977 of the Industrial tribunal. Gujarat in reference 13 of 1975 made on 21/01/1975, by the government of Gujarat in exercise of its powers under S. 10(l)(d) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (XIV of 1947) (hereinafter called the Act) for adjudication of the dispute relating to five demands viz. washing allowance, woollen jersey, unclean allow- ance, transport allowance and variable dearness allowance linked with Ahmeda- bad cost of living index and adequate dearness allowance equal to that of textile workers of Ahmedabad (which is 100% neutralisation) sponsored by the Chemicals Kamdar Sangh, Mithapur (hereinafter referred to as the Sangh).

(2) BRIEFLY stated, the facts leading to the appeal are : The appellant is a public limited company registered under the Indian Companies Act and has its factory at Mithapur in the State of Gujarat. As per its practice and policy of recognising and negotiating with the Union enjoying the support of largest number of its workers, it carried on its dealings with the Sangh (which was the recognised union) till 25/01/1973 when the Assistant Commissioner of Labour, Ahmedabad declared as a result of the verification made by him that the Tata Chemicals Employees Union (hereinafter referred to as "the Employees Union") was entitled to be recognised under the Code of Discipline in view of the fact that 55 % of the total number of the employees of the con- cern were its members and addressed a communication to the appellant request- ing it to recognise the said union. Pursuant to this communication, the appel- lant accorded recognition to the Employees Union with effect from 25/01/1973. Thereupon the Sangh filed a Special Civil Application challenging the aforesaid order of the Assistant Commissioner of Labour in the High court of Gujarat which was summarily rejected vide order dated 3/04/1973. On 18/06/1973, the Employees Union submitted a charter of demands to the appellant which included inter alia a demand for dearness allowance at 100% of Ahmedabad Cotton Textile Rate popularly known as the Textile Dearness Allowance. In respect of these demands, the Conciliation Officer summoned a conciliatory meeting for 26/07/1973. Meanwhile on 9/07/1973, the Sangh representing about 800 workmen of the concern submitted the afore- said charter of demands before the management which also included a demand for dearness allowance as paid to the workers of the Cotton Textile Industry. The charter also contained an intimation to the management of the Sanghs intention to resort to strike for realisation of its demands. As negotiations between the parties for an amicable settlement did not prove fruitful, the Sangh wrote to the Conciliation Officer, Rajkot, on 17/07/1973 requesting him to intervene. After preliminary discussions with both the parlies, the Con- ciliation Officer admitted the case for conciliation on 30/08/1973. As the conciliation proceedings held by him from time to time between Septem- ber 7, 1973 and 6/11/1973 (to which the Employees Union was also made a party at its request) did not lead to a settlement between the parties, the Conciliation Officer submitted his failure report to the State government on 14/12/1973. On even date, the appellant arrived at an agreement with the Employees Union in respect of the demands submitted by the latter on behalf of its daily rated and monthly rated members including clerical staff. It was agreed between the parties to this settlement that it would remain in force for a period of three years with effect from January 1, 1974. A notice with regard to the settlement with the Employees Union was put up on general notice board by the appellant on 17/12/1973. On 21/01/1975, the State government made, as already stated, a reference to the Industrial tribunal for adjudication of the dispute respecting the aforesaid demands raised by the Sangh. In the course































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top