SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(SC) 505

O. CHHINNAPPA REDDY, Y. V. CHANDRACHUD
Anil Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


(1) THE report of the doctor which we had called for by our Order dated 10/10/1980 shows that eight out of the ten petitioners before us lost their eyesight totally or partially. The report submitted by Dr. K.S. Roy in each individual case shows that-

(I) most of the petitioners are suffering from collapse of one ar both of the eyeballs ;

(II) the sight of one or both of their eyes is lost ;

(III) there is perforation of their eyeballs by burn with a corrosive substance; and that

(IV) their eyes have been punctured by some sharp and pointed weapon.

The remaining two petitioners have been released and therefore no report could be sent regarding them.

(2) THE report of the doctor will shock the conscience of mankind. There has been the most flagrant violation of the safeguards provided by Articles 19 and 21 of the Constitution. There is nothing that the court can do to restore the physical damage, which seems irreparable. But the offenders must at all events be brought to book at least in the hope that such brutal atrocities will not happen again.

(3) WITH that end in view, we direct that the Superintendent of the Bhagalpur central Jail will file






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top