SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(SC) 134

D. A. DESAI, E. S. VENKATARAMIAH, Y. V. CHANDRACHUD
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
Taj Trading Company – Respondent


Y.V.CHANDRACHUD, CJI.

(1) WE direct appellants 1 and 2 - the Union of India and the Chief Controller of Imports & Exports, Udyog Bhavan, New Delhi - to consider the application dated 25/12/1978 filed by the respondent in respect of the contract dated November 28, 1978, for 500 MT R.B.D. Palmolein since, the application filed by the respondent for an import licence in respect of the aforesaid contract was rejected by the Union of India on the ground only that the respondent had failed to show that its manager had authority to sign the contract on its behalf. The reconsideration by appellants 1 and 2 of the question whether an import licence should be granted to the respondent will be limited only to the aforesaid question. The application filed by the respondent shall be disposed of hy appellants 1 and 2 within four weeks from today.

(2) THE appeal shall stand disposed of in terms of this Order.

(3) THERE will be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top