SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(SC) 357

E. S. VENKATARAMIAH, V. D. TULZAPURKAR, Y. V. CHANDRACHUD
Shafiqur Rehman Khan – Appellant
Versus
Mohammad Jahan Begum – Respondent


(1) HEARD counsel. Special leave granted.

(2) WE set aside the judgment of the High court dated 30/06/1980 and restore that of the learned 1st Additional District Judge, Lucknow dated 19/04/1979) with the following modification : "The executing court will determine, with the help of Ex. 3 and such other evidence which the parties may adduce, whether the decreeholders have established satisfactorily the identity of the property in regard to which they have obtained the decree under execution. If the identity of the property is established, but not otherwise, the decree will be executed and the decreeholders will be put in possession of the property in accordance with law. It will, of course, be open to the judgment- debtors to show that the decree is incapable of execution for the reason that the property cannot be properly identified."

(3) THERE will be no order as to costs.

(4) THE appeal shall stand disposed of in terms of this Order.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top