SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(SC) 197

O. CHHINNAPPA REDDY, Y. V. CHANDRACHUD
Chandigarh Paper Board Mills Private LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Chief Commissioner, Union Territory Of Chandigarh – Respondent


Advocates:
A.Subhashini, GIRISH CHANDRA, VIMAL DAVE

(1) CLAUSE (9) of the conveyance dated 4/11/1958 which was executed by the State of Punjab in favour of the appellant says that the transferee, that is to say, the appellant, shall not use the site sold to him for a purpose other than an industrial purpose and further that be shall not use the construction on it for a purpose other than for which it has been constructed, except in accordance with the rules made under the Capital of Punjab (Development and Regulation) Act, 1952. There is no doubt that what was intended by this clause was that the site sold to the appellant shall not be used by him for a commercial purpose as contradistinguished from an industrial purpose, that is to say, that he shall use it for the purpose of his own industry or business but not for any other purpose. It is common ground that the appellant has constructed a weighing bridge on the site sold to him and he is allowing members of the general public to use that weighing bridge on payment. He was entitled to construct the weighing bridge and to use it for his own purposes but to the extent that he allows the members of the general public to use it, he has violated the terms of Clause (9).

(2)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top