SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(SC) 180

R. S. PATHAK, RANGANATH MISRA, M. M. DUTT
Commissioner Of Income, Madras – Appellant
Versus
T. N. K. Govinda Ra. Ju Chetty – Respondent


(1) THE only question in these appeals is whether the Income Tax Appellate tribunal was right in holding that the income from interest which had accrued to the respondent on the compensation payable to him in view of the acquisition of land belonging to him for the assessment years 1955-56 and 1956-57 should be spread over the respective years to the extent to which it could be deemed to have accrued in those years. We have considered the matter carefully and we think that having regard to the circumstances of the case, including the fact that the mercantile system of account was the basis on which the interest income accrued, the High court was right in answering the question in favour of the assessee and against the revenue.

(2) THE appeals are, therefore dismissed. In the circumstances there is no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top