Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
P.N. Bhagwati, CJI., Ranganath Misra, J.
Prabha
Versus
Ram Parkash Kalra
Case No., 189 of 1986
Date of Decision, 11/12/86
Hindu Marriage Act – Section 13 - Receipt of the proceedings – Claim of compensation - Petition filed by against under S. 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act and pending in the court of Additional District Judge will stand transferred to the court of District Judge, Delhi and it may be tried by the District Judge or any other appropriate judge to whom the case may be assigned by him – Held, proceedings shall be forwarded within two weeks from the receipt of the copy of this order by the learned Additional District Judge - After the proceedings are received in Delhi, an attempt shall be made for bringing about reconciliation or settlement through the Marriage Counseling Centre in Patiala House and if this effort does not succeed within a period of two months from the receipt of the proceedings by the court of District Judge Delhi petition shall be tried and disposed of by the judge in Delhi, as far as possible, within a further period of two months – Petition disposed of
(1) THE petition filed by Shri Ram Parkash Kalra against Smt. Prabha under S. 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act and pending in the court of Additional District Judge II, Shri R. S. Madan, Bhiwani, will stand transferred to the court of District Judge, Delhi and it may be tried by the District Judge or any other appropriate judge to whom the case may be assigned by him. The proceedings shall be forwarded within two weeks from the receipt of the copy of this order by the learned Additional District Judge, II, Bhiwani. After the proceedings are received in Delhi, an attempt shall be made for bringing about reconciliation or settlement through the Marriage Counselling Centre in Patiala House and if this effort does not succeed within a period of two months from the receipt of the proceedings by the court of District Judge, Delhi, the petition shall be tried and disposed of by the judge in Delhi, as far as possible, within a further period of two months.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
