Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Ranganath Misra, CJI., Kuldip Singh, M.H.Kania, JJ.
Pramod Kumar Joshi
Versus
Medical Council Of India
Case No., 1154 of 1990
Date of Decision, 2/19/91
Judgment
RANGANATH MISRA, C.J.I.
(1) THIS is an application under Article 32 of the Constitution. Petitioner, a medical graduate, on completion of his house job in Paediatrics from the Medical College at Kanpur also did house job for six months in Medicine from the G.T.B. Hospital, Delhi. He applied for a years diploma course in Paediatrics in the Medical College at Kanpur but alleges that he was denied such admission and in July 1990 was offered admission in Diploma in Medical Radiotherapy and two months thereafter was admitted to Diploma course in Clmical Pathology, According to him under the regulations framed by the Indian Medical Council, the Diploma course was available to those who had completed housemanship in the speciality and he pleaded that the refusal of admission to him and admission granted to several respondents was contrary to the regulations. He maintained that he was at S1. No. 7 of the list and ought to have been granted admission in DCH which he preferred.
(2) THERE is some force in his submission but we find it difficult at this point of time to entertain the application as the 1990-91 session is almost complete and it would not be proper to allow him admission belatedly and disturb others who have already been admitted and have been undergoing the course. We accordingly dismiss the writ petition. Petitioner may look for admission in a future year. There will be no order for costs.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
