1. Writ petition challenging a transfer order — High Court grant of interlocutory stay. (Para 2 )
Back
Next 
1994 Supreme(SC) 588
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
M.N.Venkatachaliah, C.J.I., S.Mohan, J.
State Of U.P.
Versus
V.N.Prasad
Case No. : 4585 of 1994
Date of Decision : 5/19/94
Administrative orders are presumed to be bona fide. To challenge such orders on grounds of mala fides, strong and convincing evidence must be provided; otherwise, interlocutory stays against such orders are unjustified.
Headnote:(A) Administrative Law - Transfer Order - Mala fides - Presumption is in favour of the bona fides of an order unless contradicted by acceptable material - To establish mala fides, strong and convincing evidence is required - In the absence of prima facie material to establish mala fides, an interlocutory stay of a transfer order is unjustified. (Para 2)
Facts of the case:
A Principal of a medical college challenged a transfer order before the High Court. The High Court, at the interlocutory stage of the writ petition, stayed the operation of the said transfer order.
Findings of Court:
The court found that there was no prima facie material on record to establish any mala fides that would justify the stay of the transfer order.
Issues: Whether the High Court was justified in staying the operation of a transfer order at the interlocutory stage in the absence of prima facie evidence of mala fides.
Ratio Decidendi: Administrative orders carry a presumption of bona fides. Any allegation of mala fides must be supported by strong and convincing evidence; without such acceptable material, the interference of the court at an interlocutory stage to stay the order is unjustified.
Result: Interlocutory order set aside.
Legal Category Hierarchy
Table of Contents
2. Whether the transfer order was issued with mala fides justifying an interlocutory stay. (Para 2 )
3. Absence of prima facie material to establish mala fides — Presumption of bona fides in favor of administrative orders. (Para 2 )
4. Administrative orders are presumed bona fide unless contradicted by strong and convincing evidence of mala fides. (Para 2 )
5. Interlocutory stay set aside — High Court directed to dispose of the main matter expeditiously. (Para 2 )
6. What is the legal presumption regarding the bona fides of an administrative order?
There is a presumption in favor of the bona fides of an administrative order unless it is contradicted by acceptable material. (Para 2 )
7. What standard of evidence is required to establish mala fides in administrative actions?
Establishing mala fides requires strong and convincing evidence. (Para 2 )
8. Under what circumstances is an interlocutory stay against a transfer order unjustified?
An interlocutory stay is unjustified when there is no prima facie material to establish mala fides, as the order is presumed bona fide. (Para 2 )
(1) WE have heard learned counsel on both sides. Delay condoned. Special leave granted.
(2) THE High court, at the interlocutory stage of writ petition moved by the respondent, Dr V.N. Prasad, Principal, B.R.D. g Medical College, Gorakhpur challenging an order of transfer, has stayed its operation. We are of the opinion that at the stage at which the matter was brought to engage the attention of the High court, there was no prima facie material to establish any mala fides which required strong and convincing evidence. The presumption is in favour of the bona fides of the order unless contradicted by acceptable material. The interlocutory order of the High court is, in our opinion, unjustified. The order is set aside. We request the High court, however, to dispose of the main matter itself as expeditiously as possible.
(3) THE appeal is disposed of accordingly
