SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(SC) 1102

A. M. AHMADI, S. MOHAN, SUJATA V. MANOHAR
State Of U. P. – Appellant
Versus
Mohd. Waqar Hussain – Respondent


(1) THIS appeal by the State of U.P. is directed against the judgment of the High court of Allahabad (Lucknow bench) dated 15/12/1992 whereby the High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by the State government against the order of the Public Services tribunal dated 9/3/1992. It appears that Respondent 1- employee had joined service as a temporary Assistant Engineer (Civil) on ad hoc basis some time in 1964. The appointment order in terms indicated that the appointment was purely provisional for a period up to August 1965 or till the regularly selected candidates became available, whichever was earlier. In the year 1967, several Assistant Engineers, including Respondent I, came to be retrenched. On the representation made by the U.P. Engineers Association, Assistant Engineers who were not approved by the State Public Service Commission, were continued on ad hoc basis for two years subject to the Public Service Commission approving them after holding special test. The State Government acceded to this demand and requested the Public Service Commission to conduct a special interview in relation to the unapproved provisional Assistant Engineers by the letter dated 25/6/1968





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top