SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(SC) 289

K. RAMASWAMY, M. N. VENKATACHALIAH
State Bank Of India – Appellant
Versus
Special Secretary Land And Land Revenue And Reforms And Land And Land Utilisation Deptt. Of W. B. – Respondent


(1) THESE two appeals are filed on a certificate granted by the High court of Calcutta under Articles 133 and 134-A of the Constitution, certifying that the question whether a vacant land held by a bank under a private trust is entitled to exemption under Section 19 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, for short the Act involved in the cases, needs to be decided by this Court.

(2) FACTS in Civil No. 3573 of 1988 are : That certain David Platt Sunderdale (to be called David) held and possessed property No. 350, Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose Road, Tollygunge, Calcutta comprised a total extent of 4208.04 square metres. The competent authorities under the Act found that extent to be in excess of ceiling area by 1933.02 square metres. State Bank was an executor/trustee under a will of David for that property, was issued a notice by the competent authorities on 20/5/1981 calling for the filing of a draft statement under Section 8(1 of the Act. But, the State Bank filed an application before the competent authority claiming exemption of the property under Section 19(1(iv) and Section 20 of the Act. However, when that application was rejected and the order of




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top