SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 446

A. M. AHMADI, M. K. MUKHERJEE, SUJATA V. MANOHAR
Gowrishankar – Appellant
Versus
Joshi Amba Shankar Family Trust – Respondent


JUDGMENTS :- Special leave granted. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated July 11, 1995 rendered by the Madras High Court disposing of two Original Side appeals. Facts leading to this appeal and relevant for its disposal are as under :

By a deed of declaration dated January 15, 1939 (sic) one Ambasankar Joshi created the respondent No.1 - trust in relation to his three immovable properties, one of which is house and ground No.429 (new No. 162) at that street, Madras (hereinafter referred to as the property) for the benefit of his poor relations and for other charitable and pious purposes. As the trustees were finding it difficult to carry out the purposes of the trust for paucity of funds they moved the High Court in 1979 for modification of the terms of the trust deed so as to empower them to sell the above properties. By its order dated November 28, 1988 the High Court granted such power subject to the condition that it would be exercised only with the permission of the Court and the concurrence of 3/4th of the total number of trustees in office.

3. Armed with the above order the trustees invited offers for purchas






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top