1. Challenge to High Court jurisdiction regarding implementation and clarification of directions issued by the Supreme Court in a prior judgment. (Para 3 )
Back
Next 
1996 Supreme(SC) 39
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.M. Ahmadi, C.J.I., M. K. Mukherjee, Sujata .V. Manohar, JJ.
STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS, APPELLANTS
Versus
RAMJEE RAM, RESPONDENT.
Civil Appeal No. ... of 1996 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 20806 of 1995), decided on January 8, 1996.
The Supreme Court holds exclusive jurisdiction over clarifications and implementation proceedings of its own judgments when it explicitly directs that no other court shall entertain such matters.
Headnote:(A) Jurisdiction - Exclusive jurisdiction of the Supreme Court - Implementation of directions given in a previous judgment - Where the Supreme Court has explicitly directed that any clarification or proceedings for implementation of its directions shall be filed only in the Supreme Court and no other court shall entertain them, the High Court is not right in exercising jurisdiction over such matters. (Paras 2 and 3)
Facts of the case:
A party approached the High Court regarding the implementation of directions given by the Supreme Court in a previous matter. However, the Supreme Court had previously observed that any clarification or proceedings for implementation of the directions in that specific judgment should be sought only from the Supreme Court.
Findings of Court:
The High Court erred in exercising jurisdiction in view of the clear directions issued by the Supreme Court in the previous case.
Issues: Whether the High Court had the jurisdiction to entertain proceedings for the implementation of directions issued by the Supreme Court when the Supreme Court had reserved such jurisdiction to itself.
Ratio Decidendi: When the Supreme Court explicitly mandates that clarifications or implementation proceedings regarding a specific judgment be filed only before it, no other court, including the High Court, has the jurisdiction to entertain such matters.
Result: Order of the High Court set aside.
Legal Category Hierarchy
Table of Contents
2. Whether a High Court can exercise jurisdiction over implementation proceedings specifically reserved for the exclusive jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. (Para 3 )
3. The Supreme Court had explicitly directed that any clarification or implementation proceedings regarding the specified judgment be filed exclusively in the Supreme Court. (Para 2 )
4. Where the Supreme Court reserves exclusive jurisdiction for clarifications or implementation of its directions, other courts lack the jurisdiction to entertain such proceedings. (Para 2 , 3 )
5. High Court order set aside for lack of jurisdiction; appeal disposed of; parties permitted to approach the Supreme Court for non-compliance. (Para 3 )
6. Can a High Court entertain proceedings for the implementation of Supreme Court directions if the Supreme Court has reserved exclusive jurisdiction?
No. If the Supreme Court explicitly directs that implementation proceedings or clarifications be filed only in its court, no other court shall entertain them. (Para 2 , 3 )
ORDER
1. Special leave granted.
2. In the All India Judges Assn. case [ All India Judges Assn. v. Union of India , (1993) 4 SCC 288 : 1994 SCC (L&S) 148 : (1993) 25 ATC 818] in the concluding paragraph this Court had observed as under : (SCC p. 317, para 56)
"56. Any clarification that may be required in respect of any matter arising out of this decision will be sought only from this Court and from no other court. Further, the proceedings, if any, for implementation of the directions given in this judgment shall be filed only in this Court and no other court shall entertain them."
3. In view of this clear direction in the aforesaid case, we are afraid that the High Court was not right in exercising jurisdiction. We, therefore, set aside the order of the High Court. However, if any part of the direction given by this Court in the aforesaid case has not been complied with, it would be open to move this Court, if so advised. The appeal will stand disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.
