SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 39

M. K. MUKHERJEE, SUJATA V. MANOHAR, A. M. AHMADI
State Of Bihar – Appellant
Versus
Ramjee Ram – Respondent


ORDER

1. Special leave granted.

2. In the All India Judges Assn. case [All India Judges Assn. v. Union of India, (1993) 4 SCC 288 : 1994 SCC (L&S) 148 : (1993) 25 ATC 818] in the concluding paragraph this Court had observed as under : (SCC p. 317, para 56)

"56. Any clarification that may be required in respect of any matter arising out of this decision will be sought only from this Court and from no other court. Further, the proceedings, if any, for implementation of the directions given in this judgment shall be filed only in this Court and no other court shall entertain them."

3. In view of this clear direction in the aforesaid case, we are afraid that the High Court was not right in exercising jurisdiction. We, therefore, set aside the order of the High Court. However, if any part of the direction given by this Court in the aforesaid case has not been complied with, it would be open to move this Court, if so advised. The appeal will stand disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top