SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(SC) 373

S. N. VARIAVA, D. P. MOHAPATRA
Kasturi Bai – Appellant
Versus
Anguri Chaudhary – Respondent


1. Leave granted.

2. The defendant in the civil suit No. 2-A of 1993 of the Court of Additional District Judge, Shahdol, has filed this appeal assailing the order passed by the Madhya Pradesh High Court on 20th June, 2000 in miscellaneous appeal No. 1191 of 1998. In the said order the High Court ordered appointment of a Receiver to be in charge of the suit properties with other consequential directions. The relevant portion of the order reads as follows :

"As a result of the aforesaid discussion, this appeal succeeds and is allowed. The impugned order dated 14.8.1998 is hereby set aside. The Trial Court is directed to require both the parties to suggest an agreed name of a person within fifteen days from the receipt of the record and a copy of this order, for his appointment as a receiver in the case. In case, they fail to do so, within the time fixed by the Trial Court, the Trial Court shall be free to appoint a person of integrity as the receiver of the suit property, who is well conversant with the legal procedures and is capable of maintaining true and honest accounts of the suit property during the pendency of the suit. The said appointment of the receiver shall be made initial









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top