Y.K.Sabharwal, J.

(1) IN Civil Appeal Nos. 767-768 of 1995, the challenge of Union of India is to the judgment and order of the High Court whereby allowing the writ petition, the Collector of Customs has been directed to release the imported goods of the writ petitioner (respondent No. 1 herein) lying with the Central Warehousing Corporation Limited (for short the Corporation). It has been further directed that the first respondent will pay demurrage, container charges and ground rent to the Corporation from the date of storage of the goods till 15/01/1991 whereas the Collector of Customs will pay the said charges on account of storage of these goods from 16/01/1991 till the date of release of the goods.

(2) IN Special Leave Petition (C) No. 1663 of 2000, the challenge of the Government is to the order of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal which upheld the order of Collector of Custom dated 22/10/1993. By the said order, the Collector of Customs directed the discharge of show cause notice dated 18/02/1991 and had directed that the proceedings be dropped. We grant leave in the special leave petition.

(3) CIVIL Appeal No. 7931 of 1995 has been filed by the original writ petitioner. The limited challenge therein is to the direction for payment of demurrage, container charges and ground rent by the said petitioner till 15/01/1991. The contention urged in this appeal is that the said charges are payable by the appellant only upto 21/09/1990 and not thereafter.

(4) THIS judgment will dispose of all four appeals.

(5) WE have heard learned Attorney General and also learned counsel for the Corporation. None, however, appeared for the importer who is respondent in Civil Appeal Nos. 767- 768 of 1995 and Civil Appeal arising out of SLP (C) No. 1663 of 2000 and appellant in Civil Appeal No. 7931 of 1995.

(6) THE importer filed Bill of Entry dated 16/08/1990 for clearance of consignment declared as 100% Polyester Fabric. On 3/09/1990, Custom Authorities conducted examination of 10% of the goods and found some discrepancies with regard to the declared length and weight of the fabric. The importer by its letter dated 4/09/1990 agreed with that examination and findings and requested the custom authorities not to go in for 100% examination of the goods. The Customs Authorities examined another 10% of the goods; on the basis whereof, it calculated average excess in length and weight. It found that total of 843.85 mts. (weight= 206.30 kg.) fabric was excess in length. The C1F value of the excess fabric was found to be Rs. 17,003/-(Assessable value Rs. 17.173.00). The importer requested the Assistant Collector of Customs for waiver of show cause notice and personal hearing. On 21st September, 19?0, the Assistant Collector passed an order on note-sheet whereby the Importer was allowed the release of the excess goods after payment of fine of Rs. 25,000.00 and personal penalty of Rs. 5,000.00. The amounts were deposited on 22/09/1990 as also customs duty amounting to Rs. 43,657.00 on the excess goods. On that day itself, i.e., 22/09/1990, DRI Officers visited the CFS Patparganj and detained the consignment on the basis of information available with them. On 15/11/1990, the DRI seized the detained goods.

(7) A writ petition was filed in the Delhi High Court by the importer seeking directions against the custom authorities for release of consignment of Polyester Fabric imported by it against duty free advance import licence urging that the consignment had been illegally and unauthorisedly detained by the custom authorities. The import was effected by the importer under Duty Exemption Entitlement Certificate (DEEC) and duty free advance import licence. Under that licence, the importer was allowed to import 80,000 Mts. of 100% polyester fabrics of C1F value of Rs. 16.16.000.00. One of the condition of important was that the importer would export 1,60,000 pieces o