Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.S. Anand, CJI., V.N. Khare and M. Srinivasan, JJ.
(Crl.) No. 2313/98 (with SLP (Crl.) No. 2392/98)
Decided On: 03.11.1998
Maulana Md. Kamaluddin and Ors. Appellants
versus
State of West Bengal and Ors. Respondent
ORDER
SLP (Crl.) No. 2313/98
1. We do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order dated 17.7.98. The special leave petition is dismissed.
SLP (Crl.) No. 2392/98
2. Since by the impugned order a notice has been issued against the petitioner to show cause why he should not be committed to prison or otherwise penalised or dealt with for deliberately aiding, abetting and instigating members of a particular community to flout the orders passed by the Court. We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order. The petitioner may show cause, as directed, to the High Court. The special leave petition is dismissed.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
