1. Looting of ornaments from a house while armed with bamboo sticks and lathis — Appeal limited to quantum of sentence. (Para 2 )
Back
Next 
2000 Supreme(SC) 1179
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
K.T.Thomas : R.P.Sethi
Dhanai Mahto
Versus
State Of Bihar
Case No. : 580 of 2000
Date of Decision : 7/26/00
Bamboo sticks or lathis are not automatically considered "deadly weapons" under Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code unless there is evidence that they were used to inflict or attempt to inflict grievous hurt.
Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code - Section 397 - Looting of ornaments and articles - Use of bamboo sticks and lathis - Whether such items qualify as deadly weapons - Mere description of bamboo sticks or lathis is not enough to classify the weapons as lethal or deadly, especially in the absence of other descriptions or evidence that the accused inflicted or attempted to inflict grievous hurt on the inmates - Limitation prescribed under Section 397 not applicable. (Para 3)
Facts of the case:
The appellants were involved in an offence where they entered a residence and looted ornaments and other articles while armed with bamboo sticks and lathis. The appeal was limited to the quantum of sentence.
Findings of Court:
The court found that the weapons attributed to the appellants cannot be described as deadly weapons.
Issues: Whether the use of bamboo sticks and lathis suffices to categorize the weapons as "deadly" for the application of the limitation under Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that without evidence of grievous hurt being inflicted or attempted, the mere use of bamboo sticks or lathis does not make a weapon lethal or deadly, thus the enhanced limitation of Section 397 IPC cannot be applied.
Result: Sentence reduced to rigorous imprisonment for 4 years.
Legal Category Hierarchy
Table of Contents
2. Whether bamboo sticks and lathis constitute deadly weapons for the purpose of sentencing. (Para 3 )
3. Bamboo sticks or lathis are not inherently lethal or deadly weapons, especially when no grievous hurt was inflicted or attempted. (Para 3 )
4. Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code is inapplicable if weapons used are not deadly and no grievous hurt was caused. (Para 3 )
5. Sentence reduced to rigorous imprisonment for four years. (Para 4 )
6. Do bamboo sticks or lathis qualify as deadly weapons?
No, the mere description of bamboo sticks or lathis is not enough to make the weapons lethal or deadly, particularly when no other descriptions are provided. (Para 3 )
7. Under what conditions is the limitation in Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code inapplicable?
The limitation in Section 397 IPC does not apply if the weapons used are not deadly and there is no evidence that the accused inflicted or attempted to inflict grievous hurt. (Para 3 )
(1) LEAVE granted.
(2) NOTICE was issued on the special leave petition limited to the quantum of sentence, and therefore, we are not disposed to consider the merits of the case. We will go by the findings that appellants were also involved in the offence found against them. The allegations made against them is that they entered the house of Public witness -4 and looted away the ornaments and other articles. They were armed with bamboo sticks and lathis.
(3) LEARNED Counsel contends that the weapons attributed to them cannot answer the description of deadly weapons. We are persuaded to accept the said contention, particularly, in view of the absence of other descriptions given to the weapons. Merely, the description of bamboo sticks or lathis is not enough to make the weapons lethal or deadly. There is no case that the accused inflicted grievous hurt or attempted to inflict grievous hurt to the inmates. Therefore, the limitation prescribed in Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code cannot be applied.
(4) CONSIDERING all aspects, we think that a sentence of imprisonment for a period of 4 years will be sufficient to meet the ends of justice. We, therefore, reduce the sentence of the appellants to rigorous imprisonment for 4 years.
(5) THIS appeal is disposed of accordingly.
