SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 1179

Dhanai Mahto – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


(1) LEAVE granted.

(2) NOTICE was issued on the special leave petition limited to the quantum of sentence, and therefore, we are not disposed to consider the merits of the case. We will go by the findings that appellants were also involved in the offence found against them. The allegations made against them is that they entered the house of Public witness -4 and looted away the ornaments and other articles. They were armed with bamboo sticks and lathis.

(3) LEARNED Counsel contends that the weapons attributed to them cannot answer the description of deadly weapons. We are persuaded to accept the said contention, particularly, in view of the absence of other descriptions given to the weapons. Merely, the description of bamboo sticks or lathis is not enough to make the weapons lethal or deadly. There is no case that the accused inflicted grievous hurt or attempted to inflict grievous hurt to the inmates. Therefore, the limitation prescribed in Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code cannot be applied.

(4) CONSIDERING all aspects, we think that a sentence of imprisonment for a period of 4 years will be sufficient to meet the ends of justice. We, therefore, re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top