SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 220

G.T.NANAVATI, S.C.AGRAWAL
State Of U. P. – Appellant
Versus
Krishna Kumar Sharma – Respondent


ORDER

1. The respondent, Krishna Kumar Sharma, was recruited as a Temporary Fireman Constable in the Office of the Superintendent of Police, in Police Fire Brigade with effect from 23-11-1971. By order dated 20-1-1980, his services were terminated by paying him one months pay in lieu of notice under the U.P. Temporary Government Servants (Termination of Services) Rules, 1975 (hereinafter referred to as "the Rules"). The respondent filed a claim petition before the U.P. Public Services Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as "the Tribunal") but the same was dismissed by the Tribunal by its judgment dated 21-11-1985. Thereafter, the respondent filed a writ petition (CWP No. 3909 of 1986) in the Allahabad High Court which has been allowed by the High Court by the impugned judgment dated 10-12-1991. The High Court has held that the termination of the services of the respondent was by way of punishment and since he was not afforded reasonable opportunity against the said action the said order was passed in violation of Article 311(2) of the Constitution. The High Court has placed reliance on the averments contained in paragraph 19 of the counter-affidavit filed on behalf of the appellants









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top