SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 123

S. P. BHARUCHA, A. M. AHMADI
Goodyear India – Appellant
Versus
Collector Of Customs, Bombay – Respondent


JUDGMENT

BHARUCHA, J. - The appeal arises upon a judgment delivered by the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal. The appellants imported bulked nylon fabric. The bill of entry described the imported goods as being Nylon Woven Dipped Diffusion Resistance Fabric, Goodyear Code EO2 NN. The imported goods wen cleared upon payment of duty as demanded. The appellants then claimed refund of the additional duty paid by them as now stated. The claim having been refused by the authorities below, the Tribunal was moved.

2. The Customs Tariff Act, 1975, prescribes in Section 3 for the levy of additional duty equal to excise duty. Sub-section (1), its Explanation and sub-section (3) of Section 3 are relevant, and they read thus :

"3. Levy of additional duty equal to excise duty. - (1) Any article which is imported into India shall, in addition, be liable to a duty (hereafter in this section referred to as the additional duty) equal to the excise duty for the time being leviable on a like article if produced or manufactured in India and if such excise duty on a like article is leviable at any percentage of its value, the additional duty to which the imported article shall be so l




















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top