SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
(Customs, Excise and Gold (Control), Appellant Tribunal, New Delhi)
A.M Ahmadi, C.J.I., S P Bharucha, J.
GOODYEAR INDIA LTD., APPELLANT
VERSUS
COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, BOMBAY, RESPONDENT.
Civil Appeal No. 3632 of 1986
decided on January 27, 1997.
Customs Tariff Act, 1975 – Section 3(1) and 3(3) - Central Excise Rules, 1944 – Rule 8 – Claim for refund - Appeal arises upon a judgment delivered by Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal - Appellants imported bulked nylon fabric - Bill of entry described imported goods as being Nylon Woven Dipped Diffusion Resistance Fabric, Goodyear - Imported goods wen cleared upon payment of duty as demanded - Appellants then claimed refund of the additional duty paid by them as now stated - Claim having been refused by authorities below, Tribunal was moved - Customs Tariff Act, 1975, prescribes in Section 3 for levy of additional duty equal to excise duty - Sub-section (1), its Explanation and sub-section (3) of Section 3 are relevant, and they read thus, Levy of additional duty equal to excise duty - Any article which is imported into India shall, in addition, be liable to a duty, equal to excise duty for the time being leviable on a like article if produced or manufactured in India and if such excise duty on a like article is leviable at any percentage of its value, additional duty to which the imported article shall be so liable shall be calculated at that percentage of value of imported article – Held, court are fortified in the view that court take by decision of this Court in Thermax (P) Ltd. v. Collector of Customs [(1992) 4 SCC 440] - So far as this category of goods is concerned, there is only one rate of duty mentioned in the notification - Fact that certain other parts of refrigerating and air-conditioning appliances and machinery may fall under item or elsewhere cannot attract higher duty on goods presently under consideration - Explanation to notification is applicable only where goods of exactly same description attract different rates of duty - See, in this connection, decisions on analogous provision in Collector of Customs v. Western India Plywood Manufacturing Co. Ltd. [1989 Supp (2) SCC 515] and Collector of Customs v. Hansur Plywood Works [1989 Supp (2) SCC 520]. We therefore, reject this contention - Court, therefore, of view that Tribunal was in error and that the judgment and order under appeal must be set aside - Appeal is allowed - Judgment and order under appeal is set aside.
JUDGMENT
BHARUCHA, J. - The appeal arises upon a judgment delivered by the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal. The appellants imported bulked nylon fabric. The bill of entry described the imported goods as being Nylon Woven Dipped Diffusion Resistance Fabric, Goodyear Code EO2 NN. The imported goods wen cleared upon payment of duty as demanded. The appellants then claimed refund of the additional duty paid by them as now stated. The claim having been refused by the authorities below, the Tribunal was moved.
2. The Customs Tariff Act, 1975, prescribes in Section 3 for the levy of additional duty equal to excise duty. Sub-section (1), its Explanation and sub-section (3) of Section 3 are relevant, and they read thus :
"3. Levy of additional duty equal to excise duty. - (1) Any article which is imported into India shall, in addition, be liable to a duty (hereafter in this section referred to as the additional duty) equal to the excise duty for the time being leviable on a like article if produced or manufactured in India and if such excise duty on a like article is leviable at any percentage of its value, the additional duty to which the imported article shall be so liable shall be calculated at that percentage of the value of the imported article.
Explanation. - In this section, the expression the excise duty for the time being leviable on a like article if produced or manufactured in India means the excise duty for the time being in force which would be leviable on a like article if produced or manufactured in India or, if a like article is not produced or manufactured, which would be leviable on the class or description of articles to which the imported article belongs, and where such duty is leviable at different rates, the highest duty.
* * *
(3) If the Central Government is satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest to levy on any imported article [whether on such article duty is leviable under sub-section (1) or not] such additional duty as would counter-balance the excise duty leviable on any raw materials, components and ingredients of the same nature as, or similar to those, used in the production or manufacture of such article, it may, by notification in the Official Gazette, direct that such imported article shall, in addition, be liable to an additional duty representing such portion of the excise duty leviable on such raw materials, components and ingredients as, in either case, may be determined by rules made by the Central Government in this behalf."
3. Under the provisions of Section 3(3) of the Customs Tariff Act, the Additional Duty Rules, 1976, have been framed. Rule 2 states that for the purposes of Section 3(3) "the additional duty leviable on any imported article specified in column (2) of the Table annexed hereto shall be equal to the excise duty for the time being leviable on the material specified in the corresponding entry in column (3) of the said Table to the extent that material is used in the manufacture of the imported article". The table reads thus :
TABLE
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
S. No. Name of article Name of material
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) (2) (3)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Fabrics containing more than 10 per Synthetic fibre
cent by weight of synthetic fibre or and yarn
yarn.
2. * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. In exercise of the powers conferred by Rule 8 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, the Central Government, by Notification No. 55 of 1978 dated 1-3-1978, (hereinafter called "the said notification") exempted textured yar
referred to : Collector of Customs v. Western India Plywood Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.